Verizon Business Contact

Can someone from Verizon Business please contact me? It appears that your network is losing traffic from Verizon Wireless (e.g. 63.59.39.232, 63.56.37.4, or 63.59.67.68) to me (AS33362, e.g. to 69.89.207.16). Note that 63.59.166.100 -> 69.89.207.16 was successfully (around 2023-11-27). This

Re: ru tld down?

> On 9 Feb 2024, at 03:10, darkde...@darkdevil.dk wrote: > > Den 31-01-2024 kl. 20:47 skrev Bjørn Mork: >> Why do they put their DNS servers in an unsigned zone? > > To try to make a more in-depth example: > > At the moment, .COM/.NET is relying on GTLD-SERVERS.NET for the authoritative > DN

Re: ru tld down?

> On 8 Feb 2024, at 17:17, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote: > > Peace, > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, 6:39 am Mark Andrews, wrote: > Given “MUST NOT” is not in RFC 4034, Appendix B, I’d take this with a grain > of salt. > > "Implementations MUST NOT assume that the key tag uniquely identifies a > DNSKEY

Get Ready for NANOG 90! Socials, Hackathon, Committee Nominations + DEI Speaker

*Get Ready for NANOG 90!* *NANOG 90 will Kick Off MONDAY! * NANOG 90 will fully upload next week! Sync your calendars, check out the venue floor map + more. *Can't make it in person? There is still time to register virtually! * *REGISTER NOW Check out our N

Spoofer Report for NANOG for Jan 2024

In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address.

Re: ru tld down?

darkde...@darkdevil.dk writes: > With this example, you are asking why neither GTLD-SERVERS.NET nor > NSTLD.COM has been DNSSEC signed? That's a good point. Yes, I guess I do. I'm sure there is a good reason for all these examples. I just need to have it fed with a tiny spoon :-) Bjørn

Re: ru tld down?

Den 31-01-2024 kl. 20:47 skrev Bjørn Mork: Why do they put their DNS servers in an unsigned zone? To try to make a more in-depth example: At the moment, .COM/.NET is relying on GTLD-SERVERS.NET for the authoritative DNS. GTLD-SERVERS.NET is currently relying on NSTLD.COM for the authoritati

Re: route: 0.0.0.0/32 in LEVEL3 IRR

Rubens, Le 31/01/2024 à 06:48, Rubens Kuhl a écrit : DoD's /8s are usually squatted by networks that run out of private IPv4 space. Indeed, most I've seen just came to the conclusion that if there's no more blocks available in 10/8, just use the next best thing : 11/8. Best regards, -- Jér