On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:15 PM Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 20:08, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> >
> > You can get IRR from RADB or AltDB.
>
> Which is not going to be useful forever ... see [1]:
>
> > Please note that 'route' and 'route6' objects created after 2023-Aug-15
> > in non-au
Tom, thanks for the feedback! We will try to avoid giving the impression
that BGP-iSec is a working solution or to oversell it otherwise; sometimes,
when one writes about a design, such `selling-speach' crawls in
without invitation or intention :)
So, I've rephrased "relatively easy to implement"
Irr and rpki are both in order?
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, 9:56 AM Dennis Burgess
wrote:
> I have two frontier circuits that are not working correctly with BGP,
> prefixes that are announced are not showing in the global table etc. Any
> frontier people can tell me where I can call to find someone t
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 21:57, Ryan Hamel wrote:
>
> Christopher,
>
> A residential customer would be getting their /56 from the providers pool via
> RA or DHCPv6. With a /32 aggregate, it can handle 1.6 million /56
> delegations, which can cover a few regions. It all depends on the planning
The only advantage is not being subject to an RIR contract and not paying
annual fees. Especially with the fee structure games ARIN has been playing over
the last decade or so.
I made the mistake of bringing my legacy resources under ARIN LRSA contract
once upon a time. I ended up transferring
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 20:08, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
> You can get IRR from RADB or AltDB.
Which is not going to be useful forever ... see [1]:
> Please note that 'route' and 'route6' objects created after 2023-Aug-15
> in non-authoritative registries like RADB, NTTCOM, ALTDB won't be
> processed.
You can get IRR from RADB or AltDB.
Rubens
Em seg., 20 de nov. de 2023, 16:00, Eric Dugas via NANOG
escreveu:
> Greetings!
>
> Let's say you inherit legacy assets (ASN & IPv4 netblock), what are the
> first advantages that come to mind (beside not having to pay annual fees).
>
> Any disadvantag
Greetings!
Let's say you inherit legacy assets (ASN & IPv4 netblock), what are the
first advantages that come to mind (beside not having to pay annual fees).
Any disadvantages? The ones I can think of is the lack of RIR routing
security services (in the ARIN region at least). No IRR, no RPKI at a
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Donelan"
> Around here, the local carrier seems to have stopped FTTH deployment.
> Instead, the carrier is convincing home builders not to spend money on
> demarc pre-wire. Wireless Home 5G service is all customers' need.
>
> Of course, the lack of dem
I give +1 for phpipam
-Original Message-
From: Justin Wilson (Lists)
mailto:%22justin%20wilson%20%28lists%29%22%20%3cli...@mtin.net%3e>>
To: NANOG mailto:nanog%20%3cna...@nanog.org%3e>>
Subject: Re: ipv6 address management - documentation
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 23:38:28 -0500
Netbox or
Dennis, let me see if I can get someone to reach out to you to get this sorted
out. Can you PM me the circuit IDs and ASN/Prefix info please?
Thanks,
-Jeff
> On Nov 20, 2023, at 9:53 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> I have two frontier circuits that are not working correctly with BGP,
> prefixes
I have two frontier circuits that are not working correctly with BGP, prefixes
that are announced are not showing in the global table etc. Any frontier
people can tell me where I can call to find someone that can assist. End users
are currently down ☹been calling numbers for the past hour,
Netbox or PHPipam. Phpipam allows you to break down subnets easier IMHo.
Justin Wilson
j...@j2sw.com
—
https://j2sw.com (AS399332)
https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Jason Biel wrote:
>
> My recommendation:
>
> https://github.com/netbox-community
>
>
>
Amir-
I have to take some issue with one comment you made in response to Job.
BGP-iSec, at this point, is just an academic study studying some new ideas
> and evaluating their impact in specific configurations, under specific
> assumptions etc.; hopefully, this may provide some help to the commun
Lancheng, thanks for your comment.
About ProConi (and ASPA): so, we're aware it's more challenging than ASPA
and have evaluated the effort required - it actually doesn't seem too bad,
although that doesn't mean that it'll be cost effective to use it. But as
I've mentioned in an earlier email to th
We are getting Unauthorized location response headers from Irtdeto on
Paramount Plus content when accessed from some of our subnets (several
subnets within a particular /21).
{"code":130301,"message":"Content is not available in this location."}
Other subnets (different /22s) of ours work fine.
I
Call for Participation – ICANN DNSSEC and Security Workshop for ICANN79
Community Forum
In cooperation with the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC),
we are planning a DNSSEC and Security Workshop for the ICANN79 Community Forum
being held as a hybrid meeting from 02-07 Marc
Hi Amir,
I really enjoy reading this paper, and I’m interested in your design of
preventing attribute manipulations and route leaks.
I think BGP-iSec is useful under a Global Attacker. But I have some concerns
about using ProConIP-list under a Full Attacker (in Sec. III-B). Using
ProConI
Around here, the local carrier seems to have stopped FTTH deployment.
Instead, the carrier is convincing home builders not to spend money on
demarc pre-wire. Wireless Home 5G service is all customers' need.
Of course, the lack of demarc planning makes things more expensive for
any post-cons
19 matches
Mail list logo
