On July 5, 2023 at 19:06 nanog@nanog.org (Owen DeLong via NANOG) wrote:
> Karin,
>
> Opinions regarding leasing vary throughout the industry. In my opinion, since
> the shift to provider assigned addresses during the CIDR efforts in the mid
> 1990s, the majority of addresses have been lease
On Jul 5, 2023, at 10:06 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
...
Opinions regarding leasing vary throughout the industry. In my opinion, since
the shift to provider assigned addresses during the CIDR efforts in the mid
1990s, the majority of addresses have been leased in one form or another.
The o
> Too much grey area with respect to property rights (or lack thereof) as they
> relate to INRs. Until there is more concrete case law on the matter, which
> isn't likely to happen in most of our careers, monetizing it will be the rule.
Hopefully IPv4 becomes irrelevant (although still used) bef
>
> To summarise, if there is no longer a need, please
> do either one of the following three things:
>
> 1| send it back to the RIR;
> 2| change the word *lease* to *transfer* and
> announce your willing to transfer the INRs you hold.
> 3| do not hesitate to discuss your alternatives with
> the RI
Dear NANOG-ers,
Hope this email finds you in good health!
Please see my comments below, inline...
Le jeudi 6 juillet 2023, Owen DeLong via NANOG a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> Karin,
>
> Opinions regarding leasing vary throughout the industry. In my opinion,
> since the shift to provider assigned
5 matches
Mail list logo
