Comcast still has data caps. My service is 1.2 TB per month. If we get
close, we get a warning email. If we were to go over (hasn’t happened yet),
we get billed per additional 500 MB.
However, I just looked at my account usage for the first time for a few
months, and somehow have had zero usage si
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Matthew Petach wrote:
I previously wrote:
Every platform I've used has a knob for turning off / relaxing as-path
loop detection. Note, for some platforms (at least Juniper), you may also
have to have your upstream provider "advertise-peer-as", though I susp
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 7:52 PM Wes Hardaker wrote:
> William Herrin writes:
> > At some point, somebody's going to want to do something with the old
> > /24.
>
> You are correct that we did not state we will or will not be returning
> the address block we have back to ARIN. We do not plan on re
William Herrin writes:
Hi Bill,
> I acknowledge that you'd prefer it be, "forever and a day," and
> perhaps that's what the answer should be, but in all due respect the
> document you cite is completely mute on the use of addresses which are
> -no longer- root DNS servers.
I cited the document
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 7:03 PM Wes Hardaker wrote:
> All root server operators have made a strong commitment to only serving
> the DNS root as managed by IANA [1], I'm afraid this option is off the
> table. Although you could use some wiggle-ling to try and say this
> principle doesn't apply to
Nathan Ward writes:
Hi Nathan,
[Sorry for the delay -- this was ICANN week and I'm just getting unburied]
> Do you have query rates over time for the old and new addresses since
> this change in 2017?
We do indeed still get traffic on the older addresses, and its not an
insignificant amount an
Matt Corallo writes:
[Sorry for the delay -- this was ICANN week and I'm just getting unburied]
> > Perhaps make it a false responder in the last of those 9 years so that
> > anybody who is truly that far behind on their software updates gets
> > enough of a spanking to stop sending you packets.
On 6/15/23 3:19 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
While a lot of ISPs gave up on data caps, the language is still
lurking in many Terms Of Service.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/chair-rosenworcel-proposes-investigate-impact-data-caps
proposed Notice of Inquiry to learn more about how broadband p
While a lot of ISPs gave up on data caps, the language is still lurking in
many Terms Of Service.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/chair-rosenworcel-proposes-investigate-impact-data-caps
proposed Notice of Inquiry to learn more about how broadband providers use
data caps on consumer plans. Da
we use IQGeo Network Manager tool called Fiber Inventory system. Can place
down fiber routes, splices, splice trays. Very neat tool.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:26 AM Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 03:12:29PM -0300, Jean Franco a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know this must have
On 6/15/23 09:21, Ryan Hamel wrote:
It can't hold full tables for transit handoffs, but the customer can
establish multi-hop BGP sessions upstream for that.
Also, you don't really need to carry a full BGP table in FIB on a
Metro-E router. That is one of the reasons it can remain cheap. You
On 6/15/23 09:21, Ryan Hamel wrote:
I would never let the customer manage the CPE device, unless it was
through some customer portal where automation can do checks and
balances, nor have the device participate in a ring topology -- home
runs or bust. If the device fails or has an issue requi
I would never let the customer manage the CPE device, unless it was through
some customer portal where automation can do checks and balances, nor have the
device participate in a ring topology -- home runs or bust. If the device fails
or has an issue requiring a field dispatch, that is on the cu
13 matches
Mail list logo
