> On May 16, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/23 7:35 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote:
>> +1 to what Josh writes below. I would also differentiate between mobile
>> networks (service provisioned to individual devices & often carrier s/w on
>> the device) and wireli
Hello Fellow NANOG 88 Attendees,
We saw some of you would like to get to know Seattle better. Our DEI committee
put together a fun activity for you to do this while also getting to know some
other community members.
We will be going on a scavenger hunt to uncover Seattle’s charms, gems and
mod
let's get to the protein. where is the most reasonable parking near the
venue?
randy, who will soon start driving up from portland
> Everyone should check out Massimo Candela's presentation "Geolocation
> problems: Do we have a solution?" for how to provide your own
> geolocation data...
>
> https://www.netnod.se/sites/default/files/2023-03/Massimo_Webpage.pdf
>
> I've seen it at recent RIPE and LACNIC conferences. Supposedl
On Sat 2023-06-10 18:33:04+0200 Mark wrote:
> > [...] you may run into geolocation issues where some geolocation
> > providers decide that many/all of your users are in one location or
> > the other,[...]
>
> This is solvable by slicing your IPv4 prefixes into /24's and
> assigning them the corre
5 matches
Mail list logo
