>
> The optical network is made up of the photonic portion and then the
> transponder/muxponder portion.
>
Thank you for that direct definition. I'm serious (not sarcastic).
One thing I've written about in papers is the nomenclature problem, and I'm
in good company.
Bill Norton had written explici
On 5/8/23 21:53, Phil Bedard wrote:
I guess let’s not confuse two things. The optical network is made up
of the photonic portion and then the transponder/muxponder portion.
A single term like “DWDM” can be confusing since it can refer to both.
Indeed.
I am short-handing to mean DWDM
On 5/9/23 00:03, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Saying that IS-IS in FRR is broken is incorrect, that it is in many ways weird
- no offense to folks who coded it :) (especially if you have worked with
commercial code bases), that it doesn’t scale/naive, missing features - for
sure.
FRR runs today s
On 5/8/23 22:52, William Herrin wrote:
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure I'd call bugs that don't appear when running FRR on Linux
(only FreeBSD), "not yet ready for business." Or did I misunderstand
your bug report?
Don't get me wrong: if you tell me it's not right until it works
without Linux-centric
Saying that IS-IS in FRR is broken is incorrect, that it is in many ways weird
- no offense to folks who coded it :) (especially if you have worked with
commercial code bases), that it doesn’t scale/naive, missing features - for
sure.
FRR runs today some of the biggest DCs in the world and is
All fixed (thanks Donald)
CVE-2022-40302 and CVE-2022-40318: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/12043
CVE-2022-43681: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/12247
Cheers,
Jeff
> On May 3, 2023, at 2:52 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2023 17:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> For those th
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:04 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
> IS-IS in Quagga and FRR are not yet ready for business, is what I would
> caution.
Hi Mark,
I'm not sure I'd call bugs that don't appear when running FRR on Linux
(only FreeBSD), "not yet ready for business." Or did I misunderstand
your bug repo
I guess let’s not confuse two things. The optical network is made up of the
photonic portion and then the transponder/muxponder portion. A single term
like “DWDM” can be confusing since it can refer to both. It will take a long
time (maybe never) to remove the photonic switching part of the
On 5/8/23 18:45, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 5/8/23 15:44, Bryan Holloway wrote:
You said, "IS-IS in Quagga and FRR are not yet ready for business, ..."
Not ready for business in what way? Performance? Cross-vendor
compatibility? Features?
Or did I misunderstand your statement?
Broken when t
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
On 5/8/23 18:45, Mark Tinka wrote:
Broken when talking to Cisco IOS XE. Catalogued here:
https://lists.frrouting.org/pipermail/frog/2023-March/001265.html
I have no doubt FRR can talk IS-IS to other instances of FRR, but that
is not a realistic scenario in a large scale network with multip
On 5/8/23 15:44, Bryan Holloway wrote:
You said, "IS-IS in Quagga and FRR are not yet ready for business, ..."
Not ready for business in what way? Performance? Cross-vendor
compatibility? Features?
Or did I misunderstand your statement?
Broken when talking to Cisco IOS XE. Catalogued he
On 5/8/23 07:03, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 5/8/23 00:22, Bryan Holloway wrote:
Curious to hear more specifics about your IS-IS assertion.
We've been running it on FRR for some time without incident, but I'll
concede that we don't do very much with it other than saying, "hey --
we're here; oh,
13 matches
Mail list logo