On 12/1/22 10:21 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
The WAF is under control of the site, but many sites blindly implement
the recommendations of the WAF provider.
I have heard tell of a CDN / WAF that is generally held in good regard
having a free tier that many people use that is much less fle
Mr. Chen-
I don't have any interest in continuing this discussion on this topic. Best
of luck to you.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:44 AM Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
> Dear Tom:
>
> Have not heard from you since the below MSG. Could you please let me
> know if you have seen it, so that we can carry on by
Pointing fingers is free.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong via NANOG"
To: r...@rkhtech.org
Cc: "James Dexter" , nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, December 1,
To make matters worse, many sites use CDNs with Web Application Firewalls.
The WAF is under control of the site, but many sites blindly implement the
recommendations of the WAF provider.
So this allows the site to blame the CDN because they blindly implement their
recommendations, while the CDN
Ooof.
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-22:15.ping.asc
Some hope here: "The ping process runs in a capability mode sandbox on all
affected versions of FreeBSD and is thus very constrainted in how it can
interact with the rest of the system at the point where the bug can occ
Dear Tom:
Have not heard from you since the below MSG. Could you please let me
know if you have seen it, so that we can carry on by avoiding the
repeated open-loop situation with this thread?
Regards,
Abe (2022-12-01 07:44 EST)
On 2022-11-22 23:23, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
Dear Tom: Pl
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/oxX69KFvsm4/m/yLohoVqtCgAJ
Start from the top post for a full history.
7 matches
Mail list logo
