Re: Verizon no BGP route to some of AS38365 (182.61.200.0/24)

On 6/23/2022 11:48 AM, holow29 wrote: I've been trying (to no avail) for over a month now to get Verizon to investigate their lack of BGP routing to 182.61.200.0/24 , which hosts Baidu Wangpan at pan.baidu.com (Baidu's cloud services/equivalent

Verizon no BGP route to some of AS38365 (182.61.200.0/24)

I've been trying (to no avail) for over a month now to get Verizon to investigate their lack of BGP routing to 182.61.200.0/24, which hosts Baidu Wangpan at pan.baidu.com (Baidu's cloud services/equivalent of Google Drive). Easily verified through Verizon's Looking Glass. We all know Verizon's B

Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

It appears that Eric Kuhnke said: >Adding a terrestrial transmitter source mounted on towers and with CPEs >that stomps on the same frequencies as the last 20 years of existing two >way VSAT terminals throughout the US seems like a bad idea. Even if you >ignore the existence of Starlink, there's a

Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

Pretty much, with the addition that 10900 MHz to 12700 MHz has for a very long time been historically reserved for Ku-band one-way and two-way satellite data services talking to geostationary satellites. The only thing that SpaceX is doing new here is talking to moving LEO satellites with their ph

Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:12 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/tech/spacex-dish-fcc-spectrum-scn/index.html The article is super light on technical detail but I think what they're saying is: The 12ghz spectrum has been allocated to satellite services which have very low p

What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/tech/spacex-dish-fcc-spectrum-scn/index.html Mike