Re: Verizon NJ <-> Hetzner DE, routes via LA?

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 2:29 PM Tomas Jonsson wrote: > Since yesterday, I've started to see an increase in latency between my > self in NJ on Verizon FIOS and Hetzner in DE. Even using Verizon:s > looking glass is giving me 250ms. This is an increase of about 150ms > (Seems to be true for most

Wave/Astound (AS11404) contact?

Hi list, If anyone has a valid contact for or is lurking from Wave/Astound (AS11404), would you please contact me off list? I'm having trouble getting a response from any of the ARIN addresses about stale PTR records causing issues, which I'd really like to get resolved. Thanks in advance // jk

Verizon NJ <-> Hetzner DE, routes via LA?

Since yesterday, I've started to see an increase in latency between my self in NJ on Verizon FIOS and Hetzner in DE. Even using Verizon:s looking glass is giving me 250ms. This is an increase of about 150ms (Seems to be true for most of the US East Coast) A traceroute seems to tell me that the t

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 01:59 Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 5/18/22 03:55, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture? > > As in "Master Services Agreement"? Admittedly vague, but deliberate. Perhaps the thread answered the question. :-

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

> > Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-). > Agreed - but wouldn't it be fair to say that, nonetheless, the availability of an MSA supports the development of network architecture? With an MSA, there is some limited, common basis for a discussion in an ecosystem of vendo

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 11:35, Mark Tinka wrote: > Unless you are truly desperate and/or happy to get stuck in vendor-land, > always wise to be slightly behind the curve when it comes to optics. Agreed, if possible do boring things and get boring results. Even in vendor land, a boring result is

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

On 5/18/22 08:39, Saku Ytti wrote: We could also add an explanation to our proposals for the acronym. :) In your fair proposal, MSA is related to network architecture as a way to standardise pluggable (optics). But as always standards are incomplete, ambiguous and do not guarantee interopera

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

On 5/18/22 08:28, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG wrote: Just to add a bit of fun to the mix - perhaps multi-source agreement was intended :) Considered that, but that would be obvious - we need optics :-). Mark.