Re: .bv ccTLD

On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 10:20:16AM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote a message of 121 lines which said: > Oh dear. They actually gave them .SS? It's an european reference. For the local people, this 2-letters code probably means nothing special, it is not their history. (I assume that the there is a

Re: .bv ccTLD

It appears that Jay R. Ashworth said: >- Original Message - >> From: "Jaap Akkerhuis" > >> Similar ideas where held for MD and TM but didn'y seem to work >> out. Furthermore, an indepent Bougainville mighs change the name >> to something else (as Zimbabwe did). > >On reflection, I don't t

Re: .bv ccTLD

- Original Message - > From: "Jaap Akkerhuis" > Similar ideas where held for MD and TM but didn'y seem to work > out. Furthermore, an indepent Bougainville mighs change the name > to something else (as Zimbabwe did). On reflection, I don't think .inc has played all that well either. As

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 7:43 AM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > The double billing (had it been present at the time) would have prevented > > me from signing the LRSA for my IPv4 resources. > > There were some community participants that su

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Owen - The RSA and LRSA agreements are identical, however, it is true that you would lose legacy holder resource status (for those IPv4 resources issued to you before ARIN’s formation) if you consolidate to a single Org with one bill under the RSA. For the curious, there are two implications t

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > The double billing (had it been present at the time) would have prevented me > from signing the LRSA for my IPv4 resources. There were some community participants that suggested that having a formal relationship with the ARIN organiz

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

> On Dec 5, 2021, at 4:24 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 12:00 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: >> >> I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, >> but ARIN will not allow it. > > > And they are right in doing so. You can't have your cak

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

> On Dec 4, 2021, at 8:24 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote: > > Dear NANOGers, > > Le dim. 5 déc. 2021 04:00, Owen DeLong via NANOG > a écrit : > I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, > but ARIN will not allow it. > > > Hi Owen, > ...so

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

I’d also be willing to consolidate under RSA if I could get the same protections I have under LRSA. ARIN won’t do that, either. Owen > On Dec 4, 2021, at 7:12 PM, John Curran wrote: > > Owen - > > Correct - ARIN will not allow you to bring non-legacy resources under > an LRSA agreeme

Re: questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 12:00 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, > but ARIN will not allow it. And they are right in doing so. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Rubens