Re: multihoming

2021-11-25 Thread Michael Thomas
On 11/25/21 11:54 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote: Christopher Morrow writes: Also, for completeness, MP-TCP clearly does not help UDP or ICMP flows... nor IPSEC nor GRE nor... unless you HTTP over MP-TCP and encap UDP/ICMP/GRE/IPSEC over that! IP over DNS has been a thing forever. IP over DoH should

Re: multihoming

2021-11-25 Thread Bjørn Mork
Christopher Morrow writes: > Also, for completeness, MP-TCP clearly does not help UDP or ICMP flows... > nor IPSEC nor GRE nor... > unless you HTTP over MP-TCP and encap UDP/ICMP/GRE/IPSEC over that! IP over DNS has been a thing forever. IP over DoH should work just fine. > Talk about layer vi

RE: anyone use fbtracert successfully?

2021-11-25 Thread Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
smokeping in master slave mode. A bit old school, but maybe still worth a try. https://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smokeping_master_slave.en.html Jean From: NANOG On Behalf Of Adam Thompson Sent: November 25, 2021 1:31 PM To: Hugo Slabbert ; Thomas Scott Cc: nanog Subject: RE: anyo

RE: anyone use fbtracert successfully?

2021-11-25 Thread Adam Thompson
Thank you!! Some of those tools are proving much more useful for me than fbtracert. (In particular, traceflow has been updated recently enough that it “just works” in common environments that have Python3. And while it may not be perfect, it’s good enough to show what I need.) -Adam (who appa

traceroute with load?

2021-11-25 Thread Dave Taht
Historically the bufferbloat effort has used irtt, ping, mtr in combination with a set of tcp flows to attempt to induce and graph the problem via the flent tool. I haven't thought all that much about ecmp or isolating the bloated hop until recently as an outgrowth of apple's networkQuality effort

Re: anyone use fbtracert successfully?

2021-11-25 Thread Hugo Slabbert
What about some other options? https://paris-traceroute.net/ https://dublin-traceroute.net/ https://github.com/rucarrol/traceflow -- Hugo Slabbert On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:54 AM Thomas Scott wrote: > Ha, my apologies, I thought I was writing this for a Linux User Group, not > a NOG. Ignore

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast

2021-11-25 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:25 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 09:43:26AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote: > > > > On 11/19/21 8:27 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > these measurements would be great if there could be a full research- > > > style paper, with methodology artifacts, and reprod

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast

2021-11-25 Thread Jared Mauch
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 09:43:26AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 11/19/21 8:27 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > these measurements would be great if there could be a full research- > > style paper, with methodology artifacts, and reproducible results. > > otherwise it disappears in the gossip strea

Re: Salesforce issues

2021-11-25 Thread Niels Bakker
* esundb...@nitelusa.com (Erik Sundberg) [Wed 24 Nov 2021, 20:57 CET]: We are receiving latency complaints to Salesforce, anyone else seeing this? [...] dig force.com +short force.com sends an immediate HTTP redirect to www.force.com. You should look up that hostname instead, and ideally yo