It appears that Stephen Satchell said:
>> or get an HE /48 over a tunnel which will do PTR or NS records appropriately.
>
>Hurricane Electric? Seriously?
I've been using HE's free ipv6 tunnels for ten years. They work great.
I don't ever recall any downtime. They assign you a /64 by default,
/48
Splynx is a commercial product designed to be an entire package for running an
ISP, including billing etc. It uses FreeRadius in the backend which chains into
their own RADIUS system. Integration for MikroTik routers is very extensive,
but we have had it working with a variety of other BNGs too
Owen,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 23:51 Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 12:34 , Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:39 PM John Levine wrote:
>
>> It appears that Owen DeLong via NANOG said:
>>
>>
> Glad you noted this. Thinking this was/is purely a hardware cycle prob
In general, my experience with IP Geolocation has been that it’s slightly worse
than a bad idea, yet that ship has sailed and like Windows, there are way too
many entrenched applications using it for logic to ever prevail.
I believe Amazon runs their own detection service for this and IIRC, they
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 00:21 , Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Owen DeLong via NANOG writes:
>
>> The addresses aren’t the major cost of providing IPv4 services.
>>
>> CGN boxes, support calls, increasing size of routing table = buying new
>> routers, etc.
>
> You're counting dual-stack costs as if
> On Sep 18, 2021, at 23:20 , Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> John Levine wrote:
>
>>> Unless their infrastructure runs significantly on hardware and
>>> software pre-2004 (unlikely), so does the cost of adding IPv6 to
>>> their content servers. Especially if they’re using a CDN such as
>>> Akama
Saku Ytti wrote:
It is almost guaranteed we are married to IPv4 past our life cycles,
because there will be a lot of drivers to keep it.
So, the war was between "IPv4 with NAT" and "IPv4 dual
stacked with IPv6". If IPv6 were simple, quickly standardized
and easily deployable, which are technic
On 9/18/21 11:20 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
> There is nothing at the protocol level stopping AT&T offering a
> similar level of service.
Setting up reverse DNS lookup for 16B address is annoying,
which may stop AT&T offering it.
How many mail servers are on the Internet t
People who keep thinking this is a technical problem that can be
engineered away are confused. People who think the relative cost of
doing lookup for IPV4/IPV6 is visible to TCO are confused. Just
because you can observe technical differences doesn't mean they are
important, it may mean you're bein
9 matches
Mail list logo
