Comcast/Xfinity blocking my domain

2020-09-06 Thread Octolus Development via NANOG
Anyone here have some contact emails where I can reach out to them and appeal it? They're falsely blocking my website. I've done a lot of research and it proves that it is almost impossible to get in touch with them, many companies have been heavily affected by the false-positive blocks. Reall

PTP/Syncronized Ethernet maturity

2020-09-06 Thread Macho Pellegrini via NANOG
Hello everybody, We have deployed PTP in our mobile NW since late 2019 as a part of the 4G/5G, however we are seeing a lots of instabilities and interop issues, a lot of the issues have ended up with SW bugs in the OS, I have no specific question, however I got the impression that the technology/p

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Tinka via NANOG
On 5/Sep/20 18:46, Randy Bush via NANOG wrote: > fracking dmark illegal header hacking :( > > apologies No worries :-). Mark.

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

2020-09-06 Thread Mark Tinka via NANOG
On 5/Sep/20 17:58, Randy Bush via NANOG wrote: > spoken like a tier two Even "Tier 1's" aren't present everywhere :-)... Although I'm not sure whether having presence in every city means you are a Tier-anything either... Mark.

Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names

2020-09-06 Thread Jeff Tantsura via NANOG
Aaron, Out of curiosity - if you are interested in SR, where are you getting your information from if not IETF (SPRING)? As for history - we (at Redback) have published 1st draft describing SR-MPLS data plane in 2003 (LDP control plane). Regards, Jeff > On Sep 6, 2020, at 09:53, Saku Ytti via

Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names

2020-09-06 Thread Saku Ytti via NANOG
Hey, On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 04:26, Aaron Gould via NANOG wrote: > Does anyone know the scope on why we have 2 names for this ? Seriously, was > it one of those things where a vendor started doing it first (pre-standard) > as sr, and then ietf started standardizing it as spring ? …or was it al