Charter AS20115 Contact

Could a Charter network engineer reach out off list for an issue we are seeing when trying to reach any Charter customers under the AS20115 We don't peer with (or get transit) directly from AS20115 and traffic seems to be blocked at the border with our transit providers and AS20115 We have tried

Re: Curious Cloudflare DNS behavior

> Again, twice in 6 weeks Cloudflare DNS seems to loose complete > track of usbank dot com as a domain. All the name servers for that domain are placed in that same domain. That in itself perhaps isn't a problem. However, they also all have IPv4 addresses (no IPv6 in sight) in the same /16 which

Equinix Chicago Traffic Drop 5/29/2020

Last night between 5:20 am and 6:50 am UTC we noticed a large drop in traffic. Looking at flow data, Google had dropped traffic in same time period. We were wondering if anyone had noticed similar drop in traffic. Thank you, Kevin McCormick

Re: RFC6550 (RPL) and RFC6775 (IPv6 Neighbor Discovery for 6LoWPANs)

Hi Etienne, I’m also not sure many of the classical network operators assembled in NANOG work with 6LoWPANs today, but I still can answer your question. > While trying to build a holistic view of LoWPANs, I'm consulting the IETF's > informational and standards documents. > > I'm struck by the

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li

Re: LiquidWeb contact re phishing 24 days

Replied offlist. On 5/29/20 11:27 AM, Jonathan M wrote: > Greetings, If anyone can help me reach a contact at LiquidWeb, there > appears to be phishing on its network for 24 days now and I cannot get a > response from them or an acknowledgement of receipt of our notices Yes, we > filled our web fo

Curious Cloudflare DNS behavior

FULL DISCLOSURE: this is an end-user issue, but one that might have some operational relevance, particularly if anyone from Cloudflare DNS is on the list EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: twice in six weeks Cloudflare DNS on my new Netgear Orbi cable modem/mesh WiFi hotspot has completely lost track of one (

LiquidWeb contact re phishing 24 days

Greetings, If anyone can help me reach a contact at LiquidWeb, there appears to be phishing on its network for 24 days now and I cannot get a response from them or an acknowledgement of receipt of our notices Yes, we filled our web forms as early as May 5. I can be reached at jonatha...@riskiq.net

LF Microsoft Bing/Cache (edge) contact?

We have an (apparently now defunct) on-premise Microsoft Bing cache. Traffic has dropped off from it over the last few months. Unlike the other cache programs, we haven’t heard anything proactive from MS – the contact who set this up with us long ago moved on to other companies. It also appears

Re: [EXT] AS hijacking (Philosophy, rants, GeoMind)

are you sure it was really udel? and not someone pretending to be udel from a random IX peering? On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:03 PM Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote: > > I will probably just get another link to https://isbgpsafeyet.com/ like I did > in the first e-mail. LOL > > > Justin Wilson > j...@m

Re: AS hijacking (Philosophy, rants, GeoMind)

Thus spake Justin Wilson (Lists) (li...@mtin.net) on Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39:46AM -0400: > One of the companies I work for recently had an issue with AS 2 (University > of Delaware) hijacking a prefix. Due to Origin AS, good upstreams, and the > like this has not really affected the traffic

Re: [EXT] AS hijacking (Philosophy, rants, GeoMind)

I will probably just get another link to https://isbgpsafeyet.com/ like I did in the first e-mail. LOL Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net — https://j2sw.com - All things jsw (AS209109) https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog > On May 29, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Chuck Anderson

Re: [EXT] AS hijacking (Philosophy, rants, GeoMind)

Go back to them and tell them that a hijacked prefix is different from a hijacked AS. On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39:46AM -0400, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote: > One of the companies I work for recently had an issue with AS 2 (University > of Delaware) hijacking a prefix. Due to Origin AS, good up

RFC6550 (RPL) and RFC6775 (IPv6 Neighbor Discovery for 6LoWPANs)

Hello folks, I'm not sure whether this is within scope as it regards LoWPANs ... please chastise freely and ignore if LoWPANs are out of scope. While trying to build a holistic view of LoWPANs, I'm consulting the IETF's informational and standards documents. I'm struck by the impression that, d

AS hijacking (Philosophy, rants, GeoMind)

One of the companies I work for recently had an issue with AS 2 (University of Delaware) hijacking a prefix. Due to Origin AS, good upstreams, and the like this has not really affected the traffic to the legit blocks. However, GeoMind picked this up almost immediately it seems. The IP blocks