On January 26, 2020 at 15:59 ka...@biplane.com.au (Karl Auer) wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-01-25 at 22:29 -0600, Aaron Gould wrote:
> > From: Ben Cannon [mailto:b...@6by7.net]
> > I started what became 6x7 with a 64k ISDN line. And 9600 baud
> > modems…
>
> Pah! Luxury!
>
> When *I* were
Good Afternoon,
If theres a Comcast DNS admin on this list, could you respond off list?
Thanks,
Aaron
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S10.
I have no idea who was the reviewer (academic or industry or whatever).
However, he didn't actually object to the assertion that latency increases
with congestion; he only raised the question of the which latency values
would be typical/reasonable for a congestion DoS attack. Notice also that
the r
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 13:11, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
> " he/she doubts that delays increase significantly under network congestion
> since he/she thinks that the additional queuing is something mostly in small
> routers such as home routers (and maybe like the routers used in our
> e
" he/she doubts that delays increase significantly under network congestion
since he/she thinks that the additional queuing is something mostly in
small routers such as home routers (and maybe like the routers used in our
emulation testbed) "
Wow, this is the first time I've found an academic chal
5 matches
Mail list logo