On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 7:58 PM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> Does Verizon still own/manage ANY of their Fios territories? I thought it
> was all sold off to Frontier at this point. It certainly all is, along
> with all their legacy LEC territories not having FTTx and having some form
> of DSL, aroun
This is that reasoning that because this particular shiny bauble is
laying right here on the table then that's the whole picture.
More likely if some of them decided to sell that IPv4 block they'd
catch up on the rent or cut deductibles on the health care plan or or
get rid of some of that 100mb
On 12/1/19 8:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
End Users
End users receive IP addresses for use in their internal networks only, and not
for distribution to external users of their Internet services.
I guess it's possible that these networks would be considered end users,
but I get the impression th
End Users
End users receive IP addresses for use in their internal networks only, and not
for distribution to external users of their Internet services.
End Users with Registration Services Plan
End users may opt to pay for ARIN registration services on the same schedule as
ISPs detailed above b
I get $500, not $150, when I read the price list.
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:06 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> You’re saying that there are two networks that are of sufficient
> complexity/size/whatever to require PA addressing, yet lack the resources
> for $150/year in registration fees?
>
> I suppose i
You’re saying that there are two networks that are of sufficient
complexity/size/whatever to require PA addressing, yet lack the resources for
$150/year in registration fees?
I suppose it’s not impossible, but I’m wondering how they afford the other
expenses associated with maintaining such a n
Speaking as a consumer I tend to purchase content and things like OTA
broadcasts are available overnight without commercials. Thus is worth it for
me. Cut the 30 minute show to 18-22 and can download without geo locks wherever
I am.
Sent from my iFridge
> On Dec 1, 2019, at 4:31 PM, Jay R. As
Not to belabor a point, but this (perhaps just the OP and not a follow-up) but
this is EXACTLY what I love about NANOG and why I’ve been a member for. Uh.
Ever.
This little community of people that get together with a united purpose of
connecting the world.
BGP requires us in a way to
Each service *is a cable company*, requiring it's own set-top box (or a
plug-in that works on your current box/tv.
Note also that you can't DVR any of this stuff, and it *does* go away.
Cheers,
-- jra
- Original Message -
> From: "Ross Tajvar"
> To: "Owen DeLong"
> Cc: "North American
On 1/Dec/19 02:54, Brandon Martin wrote:
> How slim are your margins to have been around long enough to have a legacy
> IPv4 block but not be able to afford the ARIN fees to get a comparable/very
> usable (/48 to /52 for each IPv4) amount of IPv6? And if you don't need a
> "comparable" amou
On 30/Nov/19 18:45, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> Sadly, ipv6 is creating a bifurcation of the internet. Scale shops
> have v6, and non-scale shops don’t. The big players are pulling away,
> and that makes things bleak for the folks just trying to tread water
> in ipv4.
Well, China have scale, but perhap
Matthew Kaufman writes:
> This is a great example (but just one of many) of how server software
> development works:
Small addition/correction to this example
(which I find interesting and also sad):
> Kubernetes initial release June 2014. Developed by Google engineers.
[...]
> Full support inclu
12 matches
Mail list logo
