Good news, bad news.
With an inefficient bash script on an inefficient platform, 120k
processes in less than 15minutes.
Thus far, the best I have is less than 10% reduction with barely
acceptable aggressiveness.
The distribution is too varied or the level of aggressiveness has to be
beyond
Sorry, finger faulted and hit send by accident.
In response to Ruediger’s comment about guidance to USG agencies / networks on
the issues of BGP, there is NIST guidance under development that addresses this.
NIST SP.800-189 - Resilient Interdomain Traffic Exchange: BGP Security and DDoS
Mitigat
> Mark Leonard wrote :
> Your processing time for 5k IPs should be measured in seconds (ie: less than
> one) rather than minutes on any modern core.
I agree. I am surprised by the minutes thing as well.
> Based on your pseudocode (sort -n | uniq) I get the impression that you're
> using BASH w
Dear Douglas,
Thanks for sharing the link. This is an impressive effort!
Can you share with the group what the best way is to share feedback to
effect changes in the document?
Is there a difference between just emailing you or are there official
channels to be considered?
Kind regards,
Job
On
https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-189/draft
/
This document provides technical guidance and recommendations for technologies
that improve the security and robustness of interdomain traffic exchange.
Technologies recommended in this document for securing the interdomain routing
On 10/28/19 1:43 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
Hi,
This is not an assumption, it is my experience.
Mine as well. My mail server's PTR records are identical for IPv4 and
IPv6. IPv6 fails and IPv4 is fine. I disabled IPv6 for gmail.com.
Sorry it didn't fit your case.
-
Alain
Hi,
This is not an assumption, it is my experience.
Sorry it didn't fit your case.
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax
At this time I am just trying to get an idea if the whole exercise is
worth it. Whether the processing time is feasible for 5k, 50k, 100k,
200k. Whether the results reduce the count measurably at acceptable
collateral levels.
Because rtbh scaling to 100k is one thing. And from there it could g
On 10/27/19 12:47 PM, Michel Py wrote:
Michel Py wrote :
What I like with Hilco is that it brings transparency to the market. I think
that each transfer should list the amount of the
transaction between parties. For example, I would like to know for how much
44.192/10 went.
The parties to
You could modify a radix tree to include a consolidation function and
resulting confidence. Then walk the nodes of the tree, check to see if the
subtree meets the requirements for consolidation, if so, prune and record
the confidence. You would need to re-run the consolidation from the
original d
10 matches
Mail list logo
