+1, or reactivate the Level(3) AS 3356 LG.
--pete
From: NANOG on behalf of Ca By
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:49 PM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Centurylink Looking Glass fail
Paging someone at Centurylink to fix your looking glass.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:42 AM Amir Herzberg wrote:
> The current packets could be part of a research experiment about this
> threat, or the instrumentation part of preparing such attack. I would not
> rule out research, since it isn't trivial to know if the attack can be
> really viable to clog
Paging someone at Centurylink to fix your looking glass.
https://lookingglass.centurylink.com
None of the functions in any of the cities work
Your network is kind of a big deal, so please try to provide visibility to
your routing state so the rest of us can do our day-job, on Sunday
On 8/18/19 6:41 AM, Amir Herzberg wrote:
> The number of TCP syn-ack amplifiers is large. It may suffice to allow
> clogging a provider or IX, using low load per amplifier, as described.
> Such low load is likely to be undetected by most operators, and even
> when detected (e.g. by Jim), only few (
The number of TCP syn-ack amplifiers is large. It may suffice to allow
clogging a provider or IX, using low load per amplifier, as described. Such
low load is likely to be undetected by most operators, and even when
detected (e.g. by Jim), only few (e.g. Mike) will have sufficient
motivation to blo
5 matches
Mail list logo
