Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

* sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) [Fri 24 May 2019, 00:28 CEST]: And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent registration page. Any others who had that coincidence? No, and I've gotten like five by now. -- Niels.

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

Mine came 21 May. It was a .doc. Sent from charter.net, with the user portion of the sender very similar to a nanog contributor. And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent registration page. Any others who had that coincidence? —Sandy > On May 23, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Richar

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

On 5/23/19 4:16 PM, Matt Harris wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer > mailto:christof...@netravnen.de>> wrote: > > Appreciate the warning! > > On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote: > > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using > t

Re: Google weird routing?

Seems to be more end-user oriented rather than targeted at netadmins. There's no real contact to the GeoIP team besides the peering portal and that form, except maybe the NOC. (at least none I found yet) Am 23.05.2019 um 23:23 schrieb Ross Tajvar: > Yeah, that's honestly a pretty crappy form. No

Re: Google weird routing?

Yeah, that's honestly a pretty crappy form. No room for an explanation, no individual contact, and an ETR of a month. I'm surprised there's not a better way to address issues like this On Thu, May 23, 2019, 5:13 PM Matt Harris wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:01 PM Patrick Schultz > wrote: >

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer < christof...@netravnen.de> wrote: > Appreciate the warning! > > On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote: > > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using the > NANOG domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG organ

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

Appreciate the warning! On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote: > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using the NANOG > domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG organization. Please be > aware if you receive a message matching this description and always make

Re: Google weird routing?

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:01 PM Patrick Schultz wrote: > https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip/ > > Thanks! Giving that a shot. It's still loading www.google.com though if I try to hit it in a browser (not redirecting to a different language/CCTLD specific site though) so I had to put

Re: Google weird routing?

https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip/ Am 23.05.2019 um 22:55 schrieb Matt Harris: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:24 PM Filip Hruska > wrote: > > Google maintains their own GeoIP database. If you peer with them and have > access to the peering portal, you can co

Re: Google weird routing?

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:44 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:11 PM Matt Harris wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:06 PM Christopher Morrow < > morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> not sure where you are starting from (really) .. can you provide a: > >> dig www.g

Re: Google weird routing?

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:24 PM Filip Hruska wrote: > Google maintains their own GeoIP database. If you peer with them and have > access to the peering portal, you can correct the location yourself. > Otherwise they have a public form somewhere. > > --- Filip > Googling around a bit does not yie

Re: Google weird routing?

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:11 PM Matt Harris wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:06 PM Christopher Morrow > wrote: >> >> not sure where you are starting from (really) .. can you provide a: >> dig www.google.com >> >> for me? My guess is that as Jared noted you got somehow looking like >> you are

Re: Google weird routing?

> On May 23, 2019, at 4:11 PM, Matt Harris wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are > sending you to India? > > Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various CDN/Cloud > providers

Re: Google weird routing?

Google maintains their own GeoIP database. If you peer with them and have access to the peering portal, you can correct the location yourself. Otherwise they have a public form somewhere. --- Filip On 23 May 2019 10:11:30 pm GMT+02:00, Matt Harris wrote: >On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jared M

Re: Google weird routing?

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are > sending you to India? > > Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various CDN/Cloud > providers or a different one? > This is my thinking, too, however my r

Re: Google weird routing?

not sure where you are starting from (really) .. can you provide a: dig www.google.com for me? My guess is that as Jared noted you got somehow looking like you are in india to whatever does that magic :) On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Matt Harris wrote: > > Hey folks, > Looking at an mtr goin

Re: Google weird routing?

I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are sending you to India? Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various CDN/Cloud providers or a different one? - Jared > On May 23, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Matt Harris wrote: > > Hey folks, > Looking at an mtr goin

Google weird routing?

Hey folks, Looking at an mtr going out via a couple of different transit circuits, Google seems to be doing weird things. RTT pinging google.com is coming up with like 250-300ms times, but mtr's are telling me my packets are hitting google's network very quickly. Google's network then seems to sen

Grande Communications Contact

Hello, Does anyone have a Grande Communications Contact? Thanks, Conrad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Spamming of NANOG list members

Hello NANOG Community, It has come to our attention there are spamming messages being sent to members of the NANOG mail list spoofed to look as though they are coming from the NANOG organization. The messages being sent refer to NANOG Remittance, with an attachment containing a virus. These m