Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

On 27/04/2019 06:44, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:48 PM Owen DeLong > wrote: > Do you honestly believe that hijackings are being committed by ARIN members or even ARIN resource holders that have signed RSAs with ARIN? Wasn't Softlayer (an ARIN resource

Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

Welcome to the Internet. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Rich Kulawiec" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 10:34:44 AM Subject: Re: Packetstream - how

Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 06:31:08PM -0700, William Herrin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:06 PM John Levine wrote: > > > I assumed that something this sleazy would be offshore, but their > > terms of service say they're in Los Angeles. > > > > They tricked you. [snip] Also, unless I'm misread

Regarding the ARIN Advisory Council and ARIN PDP (was: Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation)

On 26 Apr 2019, at 5:49 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote: > ... > Not only that. I really think they have not invested enough time to read the > proposal, check with the authors and then take a decision. We have got some > email exchange, but clearly not sufficient. I also must state th

Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

Hi, El 27/4/19 1:35, "Jared Mauch" escribió: > On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:49 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > "AP stated that at the LACNIC meeting has discussed it and they dismissed it as out of scope." > > LACNIC will have the first meeting where this topic