Re: Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

I'm sure someone else already contacted you, but in the off chance that didn't happen :) maybe find me privately and we can chat? :) On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 PM Siyuan Miao wrote: > Hi, > > We're noticed that PeeringDB records of AS15169 in IX.br (PTT.br) São > Paulo is outdated. > > I've tr

Re: Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

While I hope you get the contact you asked for, you can use IX.br communities to manipulate how your route announcement reaches them or not, so that even with the lack of other network cooperation, you might be able to achieve your goals. Rubens On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:43 PM Siyuan Miao wro

Looking for a AS15169 Google contact to update their PeeringDB records

Hi, We're noticed that PeeringDB records of AS15169 in IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo is outdated. I've tried to contact AS15169 to update it via IX Session Turnup ticket and n...@google.com but didn't get a reasonable response. That's what I got from n...@google.com: > Dear Team, > Thank you for con

IPv6 Security for IPv4 Engineers

Folks, It is often argued that IPv4 practices should be forgotten when deploying IPv6, as after all IPv6 is a different protocol! But we think years of IPv4 operational experience should be leveraged as much as possible. So we are publishing IPv6 Security for IPv4 Engineers as a roadmap to IPv6 s

Re: Oracle DBA

> This is totally off-topic. ya. none of us run oracle

Re: Analysing traffic in context of rejecting RPKI invalids using pmacct

>> Thanks for the update, but based on that description I'm not certain >> that you implemented the same thing that pmacct built, which IMO is >> what is needed by those considering deploying a drop-invalids policy. >> (Perhaps you omitted mentioning that ability in your description but >> included

Re: Oracle DBA

Sorry folks. I realized apres-deed that my DBA post was off-topic. Apologies. On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:45 PM Eric Tykwinski wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2019, at 7:12 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > This is totally off-topic. > > > Yes and no. Probably the wrong list: > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman

Re: Oracle DBA

> On Mar 13, 2019, at 7:12 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote: > > This is totally off-topic. Yes and no. Probably the wrong list: https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs I think it’s a great idea to ask for/seek human resources, since they probab

Re: Oracle DBA

This is totally off-topic. On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 7:10 PM Eric Litvin wrote: > We currently have Oracle 10g Ent Edition and running into Index and log > space issues. Looking for an Oracle DBA we can hire for a day or so to > help us cleanup and increase the space issue? > > This is in Sunnyv

Oracle DBA

We currently have Oracle 10g Ent Edition and running into Index and log space issues. Looking for an Oracle DBA we can hire for a day or so to help us cleanup and increase the space issue? This is in Sunnyvale area. Info: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi PL

Re: Analysing traffic in context of rejecting RPKI invalids using pmacct

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:26 AM Jay Borkenhagen wrote: > > > Thanks for the update, but based on that description I'm not certain > that you implemented the same thing that pmacct built, which IMO is > what is needed by those considering deploying a drop-invalids policy. > (Perhaps you omitted me

Re: Should Netflix and Hulu give you emergency alerts?

You might check this alertmap: http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php They got some API: https://hisz.rsoe.hu/ https://hisz.rsoe.hu/ws/ Common Alerting Protocol Version 1.2 http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/CAP-v1.2-os.html -- Rafał Fitt

RE: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms

> From: Saku Ytti > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:14 PM > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:09 PM wrote: > > > Yes right, but the lookup principle is the same either you look at IPv6 flow > label or you look at the Entropy label. > > Correct, FAT, Entropy and IPv6 Flow Label are all in principle s

Re: Free Open Source Network Operating Systems

On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 16:09, Colton Conor wrote: > Right now, the cost of the whitebox plus a paid network operating system > seems to equal the same cost as a discounted Juniper, Cisco, or Arista. I am > not seeing the savings on paper. I'm not going to defend the prices of Cisco/Juniper/et al