RE: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Payam Poursaied
Hi Nick How many devices are you looking for? Consider ZyXEL 1248: https://www.zyxel.com/uk/en/products_services/48-port-Temperature-Hardened-ADSL2--Box-DSLAM-IES-1248-5x-IES-1248-5xA-Series/ For PPP and those stuff, you can rely on MikroTik. i.e. https://mikrotik.com/product/rb4011igs_rm

Re: Changing upstream providers, opinions/thoughts on 123.net and cogent

2019-01-04 Thread Brandon Martin
To reiterate what's been said... I would not want to be single-homed to Cogent. They're fine (and generally useful and a reasonable use of your operating money) in a blend. I'm not familiar with 123.net, but looking briefly at them, they appear to be a regional blend. Much preferable compar

Re: Changing upstream providers, opinions/thoughts on 123.net and cogent

2019-01-04 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:40 PM Aaron Henderson wrote: > I work for a rural ISP and the powers that be have been thinking about > changing our upstream providers. The big names on the table right now are > 123.net and Cogent. > > I was hoping some of you here might have experience with these prov

Re: Changing upstream providers, opinions/thoughts on 123.net and cogent

2019-01-04 Thread Ben Cannon
Run BGP and use multiple upstream providers as soon as you can. -Ben > On Jan 4, 2019, at 4:57 AM, Aaron Henderson wrote: > > I work for a rural ISP and the powers that be have been thinking about > changing our upstream providers. The big names on the table right now are > 123.net and Cogent

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Rob Pickering
Just a thought, would a two wire Ethernet extender technology (eg Phybridge) provide you with a simpler solution? xDSL needs a lot of infrastructure for a low port count (& budget) application. I have no idea if you can split the baseband out to provide POTS over the same pair, but even if you ca

Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location

2019-01-04 Thread David Kehoe
157/attachment-0001.html<http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190103/b4c3f157/attachment-0001.html>> -- Message: 10 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:21:32 +0300 From: Job Snijders mailto:j...@ntt.net>> To: Dominik Bay mailto:d...@rrbone.net>> C

Changing upstream providers, opinions/thoughts on 123.net and cogent

2019-01-04 Thread Aaron Henderson
I work for a rural ISP and the powers that be have been thinking about changing our upstream providers. The big names on the table right now are 123.net and Cogent. I, along with the people in my circle, do not have any experience with these providers and all we are getting is what sales are dishi

Re: How to choose a transport(terrestrial/subsea)

2019-01-04 Thread Mehmet Akcin
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:04 PM Jason Bothe via NANOG wrote: > KMZs or no business. Period. > You can say that in US, EU but you won't be able to in certain places unless you are willing to take the extra mile and work with people.

Weekly Routing Table Report

2019-01-04 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@li

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Brandon Martin
On 1/4/19 12:53 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: The "newer" replacement for the 42xx series was the bitstorm (Bitstorm-RP2-152-AC), and they came in AC as well and 48 ports -- in a 1.5 U I think . Yep, that's probably the one you want to look at. I've got one on a shelf. Looks like a nice box.

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Shawn L via NANOG
The "newer" replacement for the 42xx series was the bitstorm (Bitstorm-RP2-152-AC), and they came in AC as well and 48 ports -- in a 1.5 U I think . -Original Message- From: "Blake Hudson" Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 12:47pm To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: IP Dslams I was thinki

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Blake Hudson
I was thinking the same thing. They're a few years out of support, but the Zhone 42xx IP DSLAM provides a 1Gbps ethernet uplink and 24 ADSL2+ DSL user ports per 1U chassis (stackable to achieve 192 ports total). Wish they were available in AC for non-telco use. http://support.zhone.com/support/

(FIXED) Re: 192.208.19.0/24 hijack transiting 209, 286, 3320, 5511, 6461, 6762, 6830, 8220, 9002, 12956

2019-01-04 Thread Dominik Bay
Thanks for your efforts in filtering and liaising with CN! This issue has been fixed by ~ 1430 UTC today. 0x28B95CE4E3F0918D.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Nick Edwards wrote: Howdy, We have a requirement for an aged care facility to provide voice and data, we have the voice worked out, but data, WiFi is out of the question, so are looking for IP-Dslams, preferably a system that is all-in-one, or self contained, as in contains

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Jeff Shultz
You might start hunting on the used market for Occam/Calix B6 equipment, specifically the B6-252 ADSL2+ and POTS card and the 12 slot chassis. You'll have to put in some supporting infrastructure, but they do work well, and I know of at least two aftermarket repair places that will repair them for

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Shawn L via NANOG
Might want to look for old Zhone ip bitstorm dslams. There should be a bunch on the used market. They do all of the ATM conversions internally so you just need to feed them with ethernet. -Original Message- From: "Nick Edwards" Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 9:36am To: "Brandon Mart

Re: IP Dslams

2019-01-04 Thread Nick Edwards
They don't have a large budget and although I'm yet to get prices on adtran's (understandable, holidays 'n all) I doubt it will fit within their budget, it's looking more like getting a few planet dslams and configuring a linux box as the bng, been 10 years since I've had to do that kind of setup,

Re: 192.208.19.0/24 hijack transiting 209, 286, 3320, 5511, 6461, 6762, 6830, 8220, 9002, 12956

2019-01-04 Thread Job Snijders
Dear all, NTT / AS 2914 deployed explicit filters to block this BGP announcement from AS 4134. I recommend other operators to do the same. I’d also like to recommend AS 32982 to remove the AS_PATH prepend on the /24 announcement so the counter measure is more effective. Kind regards, Job On Fr