Equinix SV8 Peering fabric flooded since 1:45PM PST

Since around 1:45PM PST today we've been receiving a constant 10Gbps of flooding from the SV8 peering fabric. Traffic is not in the VLAN 6 peering VLAN so I haven't peeked at it. Anyone else seeing this at that exchange? Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868

Godaddy Contact needed for routing issue

Hello, Can someone from GoDaddy's routing team contact me off list. We have customer's unable to reach www.cat5cableguys.com via the Equinix Chicago - Internet Exchange. #traceroute www.cat5cableguy.com Wed Jul 25 16:47:08.266 CDT Type escape sequence to abor

RE: Re: using expect to log into devices

Jimmy Hess > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Scott Weeks > wrote: > > > > --- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu > > > > On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 00:43:35 +0200, Niels Bakker said: > > > Fine as a personal exercise, of course. The inability to download > > > modules

Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange

> On Jun 5, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > > thank you very much to so many people who have reached out providing leads > , made introductions and followed up offering help. > > I wanted to update the list with the progress we have made so far. > > 1) We've identified several datace

Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:13 PM Christopher Morrow < morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > it's totally possible that the person who 'runs' the abuse@ is not the > person that 'runs' the mail system at the places in question. At my work you'll get an email issue addressed if you send it to postm

Re: Finally some common sense - No to blocking DNS

On 25 July 2018 at 10:10, Jacques Latour wrote: > This is good news for the internet up here! It's unconstitutional to block > DNS access!!! JF must be happy :) > https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-court- > rejects-quebecs-bid-to-ban-citizens-access-to-private-online-2/ > > Court reje

Finally some common sense - No to blocking DNS

This is good news for the internet up here! It's unconstitutional to block DNS access!!! JF must be happy :) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-court-rejects-quebecs-bid-to-ban-citizens-access-to-private-online-2/ Court rejects Quebec's bid to ban citizens' access to private online ga

Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:58:46PM +0200, Jérôme Nicolle wrote: > From your initial list, I can still see some prefixes with the NLnog ring : > > http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=206.41.128.0 > http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=52.128.192.0 > http://lg.ring.nlnog

Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018

Hi Ronald, >From your initial list, I can still see some prefixes with the NLnog ring : http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=206.41.128.0 http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=52.128.192.0 http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_bgpmap/lg01/ipv4?q=206.222.128.0 Also http://lg.

RE: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018

> But this is a rather entirely different case. In this case, it seems that > one very notable peering that -did- in fact exist, between AS205869 and > AS6939, was not reported at all on the bgp.he.net page linked to above. HE usually learn these hijacked routes from IX peering and route server