Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:08 PM, wrote: > From what I can tell, this has not been "allocated" (probably closer to a > LOA)? > All contacts and maintainers on the inetnum object are still APNIC's, > Cloudflare > does not have free access to do whatever they want here. Did you ask WHOIS?Loo

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread Mehmet Akcin
https://www.wired.com/story/new-encryption-service-adds-privacy-protection-for-web-browsing/ On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > > > Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for > > research then being alloc

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread nop
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for > research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I > am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation. > > This prefix ,

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread Mehmet Akcin
Joining the party late. Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation. This prefix , if it will be given to any business , sh

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

2018-03-31 Thread Willy MANGA
Hi, Le 30/03/2018 à 13:00, nanog-requ...@nanog.org a écrit : > >Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:13:06 -0400 >From: Doug Clements > >>From https://1.1.1.1/: >For IPv6: *2001:2001::* and/or *2001:2001:2001::* No, it's 1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com (2606:4700:4700::1001 and 2606:4700:4700:: )