why is no one exploring converting this mailing list to a blockchain?
major missed opportunity.
randy
> IPv6 still solves your problem if you add any of NAT64, DS-Lite, 464xlat,
> MAP-T, MAP-E.
you forgot the sarcasm emoji
randy
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 04:02:44AM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> The hierarchical as-set strategy has the problem that many fails to
> parse it correctly. We use it at NL-IX with the result that their
> portal believe we have no peers.
That sounds like a simple bug in that specific portal. If yo
The hierarchical as-set strategy has the problem that many fails to parse
it correctly. We use it at NL-IX with the result that their portal believe
we have no peers.
Den 24. jan. 2018 15.50 skrev "Job Snijders" :
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:23:48PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Alain Hebert wrote
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 04:30:56PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:48:58PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > --- thread hijack ---
> >
> > Coincidentally, I'm working to define something like "AS-SETs in
> > RPKI". There are a number of downsides to "AS-SETs in IRR":
> > coll
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:48:58PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> --- thread hijack ---
>
> Coincidentally, I'm working to define something like "AS-SETs in RPKI".
> There are a number of downsides to "AS-SETs in IRR": collisions between
> databases can exist, it is hard to figure out what AS-SET t
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:23:48PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Alain Hebert wrote:
> > Any feedback on best practices and "other avenue" about IRR naming?
>
> Known problem - you're asking for trouble unless you filter IRRDB
> queries by source:
>
> There isn't a global namespace for as
7 matches
Mail list logo
