Well yes, but functionally, how is IP transport sufficiently different
to make it an "information service" rather than a "telecommunications
service?" At least that's the argument I'd make against reclassifying
access services.
Miles
On 11/22/17 9:24 PM, Luke Guillory wrote:
Those normall
Those normally come with ASRs and a tariff from the regulated side of things.
At least from my experience anyway.
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 22, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Miles Fidelman
mailto:mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>> wrote:
On 11/22/17 2:50 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 P
On 11/22/17 2:50 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
The FCC is about to reclassify "Broadband Internet Access Service" as an
information service instead of Telecommunications Service. This
prombpted the following
Regarding transit and traffic exchange, in today’s FCC Declaratory Ruling:
166. Deregulating Internet Traffic Exchange. Today, we return to the pre-Title
II Order status quo by classifying broadband Internet access service as an
information service, and in doing so, reverse the extension of Tit
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> The FCC is about to reclassify "Broadband Internet Access Service" as an
> information service instead of Telecommunications Service. This
> prombpted the following question which isn't about the FCC action
--- jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote:
From: Jean-Francois Mezei
This is about how does one define Transit provider vs ISP ?
Just curious to see if there are agreed upon definitions
from the network operators's point of view.
--
Different parts of the sa
I can't seem to find the answer for this. But I'm curious as to what
exactly is proposed.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> The FCC is about to reclassify "Broadband Internet Access Service" as an
> information service instead of Telecomm
The FCC is about to reclassify "Broadband Internet Access Service" as an
information service instead of Telecommunications Service. This
prombpted the following question which isn't about the FCC action per say.
This is about how does one define Transit provider vs ISP ?
Cogent for instance acts
Of potential interest to NANOG members, a key element of the new digital TV OTA
standard, ATSC 3.0 (besides improved efficiency/flexibility of modulation, 4K,
HEVC video coding, AC-4 immersive audio, high dynamic range/wide color gamut),
is the expectation that it will be typically be viewed on
Jason, we had a similar issue as well. I was able to get in contact with
some helpful people at Amazon who got it fixed for us. I passed your info
along to them. If anyone else is having the same issue, shoot me a message
and I'll pass your info along as well.
Adam
-
Hello all
Mike,
While that's true today it's changing rapidly. Linear viewership is,
depending on your take on things, either in the beginning or the middle of
it's long tail phase. You're right in that we'll have people using linear
viewing habits for a long time, but that model only looks sustainable ov
On 11/22/17 9:51 AM, Aaron Gould wrote:
This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years..
But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies ,
which are riding a 3rd party transport network
Anyone ever experienced anything strange with underlying trans
This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years..
But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies ,
which are riding a 3rd party transport network
Anyone ever experienced anything strange with underlying transport network
mtu possibly causing ospf
13 matches
Mail list logo
