Hi Mehmet,
*Great effort here. +1.*
I'd suggest that you bring new faces to the game. New ideas are needed.
Topic wise:
- 'inside' settlement free peering
- Content vs. Network Operators, and right sizing where the traffic comes
from
- Once and for all: Are IXP's as dead as some say?
Hope tha
Hi,
What's more concerning here is that those prefixes were able to pass through
all filters on their way, via their transits and maybe probably via their peers
as well. Haven't we been here before !?!
And here I thought 2017 internet would be a "safer" place. Silly me...
Y.
> Le 1 avr. 201
Hi all,
Perhaps another explanation is that these are router2router linknets
between the involved parties, and all we are seeing is the effect of
"redistribute connected". If this is the case, the word "hijack" might be
somewhat strong worded.
Kind regards,
Job
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 23:25, Tyle
So not only are they hijacking prefixes, they're leaking the /30s to their
peers. Failure through and through.
On Saturday, April 1, 2017, George William Herbert
wrote:
>
> Hey, Bharti, knock that off.
>
> http://bgpstream.com/event/78126
> http://bgpstream.com/event/78125
> http://bgpstream.co
Hello,
As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together
content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection
Track"
I would like to ask those who will attend, have attended in person in the
past or those who have organized similar events to chime in
Hey, Bharti, knock that off.
http://bgpstream.com/event/78126
http://bgpstream.com/event/78125
http://bgpstream.com/event/78124
http://bgpstream.com/event/78123
http://bgpstream.com/event/78122
Sent from my iPhone
6 matches
Mail list logo
