On Mon Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of
> any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of
> content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with
> vendor consent) would have a catastro
I have referred to online sessions from the past several times.
NANOG is great at preserving information, compared to other conferences.
In addition, if you attend a conference, say you have to missed a session
due to business distractions, you can usually watch it that evening in
your room. If yo
On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any
>> sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even
>> vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific se
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any
> sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even
> vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a
> cata
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any
> sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even
> vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a
> catastroph
Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any sessions
at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even
vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a
catastrophic effect on conference attendance.
NANOG doesn't seem to have
6 matches
Mail list logo
