Re: Cellular enabled console server

2017-02-25 Thread Yucong Sun
opengear is just atom based linux,at least the one i used. On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:29 PM Ryan Gelobter wrote: > > +1 OpenGear all the time - just ensure you are patching/manageing > them(!) > > Why do you say that? I'd love some details before buying opengear. > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:38

Re: Cellular enabled console server

2017-02-25 Thread Ryan Gelobter
> +1 OpenGear all the time - just ensure you are patching/manageing them(!) Why do you say that? I'd love some details before buying opengear. On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:38 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > > OpenGear all the way. Models for every need. > > +1 OpenGear all the time - just ensure you are p

Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble

2017-02-25 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > For instance, someone cannot take Verisign’s root cert and create a cert > which collides > on SHA-1. Or at least we do not think they can. We’ll know in 90 days when > Google releases the code. Maybe. If you assume that no SHA atta

Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble

2017-02-25 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:26:28 -0800, Richard Hesse said: > Git prefixes blobs with its own data. You're not going to break git with a > SHA-1 binary collision. However, svn is very vulnerable to breaking. And here's the proof-of-concept for svn breakage. Somebody managed to make the WebKit svn tot

Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble

2017-02-25 Thread Richard Hesse
Git prefixes blobs with its own data. You're not going to break git with a SHA-1 binary collision. However, svn is very vulnerable to breaking. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:11 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote: > It's actually pretty serious in Git and the banking markets where there is > high usage of sha1.

Re: Cellular enabled console server

2017-02-25 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > OpenGear all the way. Models for every need. +1 OpenGear all the time - just ensure you are patching/manageing them(!) alan