https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-cogent-blocks-pirate-bay-and-other-pirate-sites-170209/
/kc
--
Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Guelph Canada
Hi Tyler,
I have not yet tried this, but am doing so now, thanks!
-Dave
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Tyler Conrad wrote:
> Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services
> directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used.
>
> https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submi
On Tuesday, 7 February, 2017 06:59, Ray Soucy said:
> I think the fundamental problem here is that these devices aren't good
> network citizens in the first place. The odds of getting them to add
> functionality to support a new protocol are even likely than getting them
> to not have open servi
Hi NANOG,
You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past,
including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting "use
exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago for
a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic loc
On February 9, 2017 at 12:04 r...@gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:30:15AM -0800, Damian Menscher wrote:
> > The devices are trivially compromised (just log in with the default root
> > password). So here's a modest proposal: log in as root and brick the
> > device.
Clinton,
I'll give this a look on our side and ping you directly off-list. Thanks.
On 2/9/17 3:13 PM, Clinton Work wrote:
If anybody is reading the NANOG list from the GTT NOC, can you look at
your route-server with the BGP session flapping every couple of minutes.
route-server.as3257.net>show
It probably doesn't account for those situations. In the case of security
products, it's also likely that multiple devices are hosting port 80
But it doesn't matter too much. Having this kind of data helps us
prioritize what devices have the biggest chunk of the infected pie.
On Feb 9, 2017 12:04
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 14:54:26 -0500, William Herrin said:
> Is there some way an industry association could overcome this? Perhaps
> have some trivial way to assign each model of IoT device some kind of
> integer and have the device report the integer instead of its plain
> text manufacturer and ha
If anybody is reading the NANOG list from the GTT NOC, can you look at
your route-server with the BGP session flapping every couple of minutes.
route-server.as3257.net>show ip bgp sum
NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
213.200.64.93 4 3257 6879984
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:19:01 -0800, clinton mielke said:
> Yup! All the mapping Ive done is over port 80. Id have a lot more than I
> currently have if I was looking at other ports, probably.
Wow. How does this work if more than one IoPT(*)
device is in play in the home network, especially from
Looking for a customer list for this building.
Best,
Roderick.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:30:15AM -0800, Damian Menscher wrote:
>> The devices are trivially compromised (just log in with the default root
>> password). So here's a modest proposal: log in as root and brick the
>> device.
>
> No. It's nev
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:30:15AM -0800, Damian Menscher wrote:
> The devices are trivially compromised (just log in with the default root
> password). So here's a modest proposal: log in as root and brick the
> device.
No. It's never a good idea to respond to abuse with abuse. Not only
is it
Hi Ramy
I reached out to FB and they are looking for a min of 5G Traffic coming
from your AS to qualify for a Cache. Not sure how they came up with 5G as
normally everyone else would ask for 1G Traffic.
Can anyone one else confirm, maybe some one from FB is here and can clarify?
Keenan
On Feb 9
Hello Luke and all,
I stumbled upon some news about Facebook edge network servers, does anybody
know anything about the caches the FB use and the ISPs can host? and is
Facebook a part of SVA alliance?
Thanks,
Ramy
Hi Luke,
>
> Regarding HTTPS Streaming and Netflix...
>
> Netflix announced in t
15 matches
Mail list logo
