I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between networks on the list
and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG <
nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
>
> I found a
care to do a demo ?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG <
nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
>
> I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high
> volume of traffic.+10Tbps
>
> ** There is
If so, can you hit me up offlist?
Thank You,
Mike
--
Mike Lyon
408-621-4826
mike.l...@gmail.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:54:42 -0500, Andrew Kirch said:
> I can't for the life of me see why we'd have to deal with it in the course
> of our jobs beyond calling someone and having them install more A/C. This
> is, flat-out, off topic.
You don't have any fiber that runs into regen shacks in low-ly
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:49:41 -0500, Ken Chase said:
> "If it's a politically-generated thing I'll have to deal with at an
> operational level, it's on topic."
Hmm.. works for me.
pgp0FlidUAEkD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> Simply put… if the data that is hosted on the sites aforementioned then cough
> up the damn space and host it. Data space is cheap as hell these days, parse
> it and get the hell on with it already.
>
> *Disclaimer*
> not meant to single
Simply put… if the data that is hosted on the sites aforementioned then cough
up the damn space and host it. Data space is cheap as hell these days, parse it
and get the hell on with it already.
*Disclaimer*
not meant to single out any one party in this conversation but the whole
subject all t
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Royce Williams wrote:
[snip]
> IMO, *operational, politics-free* discussion of items like these would
> also be on topic for NANOG:
>
> - Some *operational* workarounds for country-wide blocking of
> Facebook, Whatsapp, and Twitter [1], or Signal [2]
[snip]
> 2
NTP Monlist was what, 200x? 100x amplification attacks are s 2013. :)
I doubt many will fall for your Rolodex expanding exercise though, sorry. (
Do people still have Rolodexes? )
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG <
nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Hello all, I'm a firs
In article
you write:
>Has there been an discussion about replacing EPP with something more modern?
No. That was easy. The spec has been updated a few times, most
recently by RFC 5730 and 5734 in 2009 but it hasn't changed much.
There is an active eppext working group in the IETF that spend
Has there been an discussion about replacing EPP with something more modern?
Cheers
Ryan
I can't for the life of me see why we'd have to deal with it in the course
of our jobs beyond calling someone and having them install more A/C. This
is, flat-out, off topic.
Andrew
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Royce Williams
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> > O
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Doug Barton said:
> [..]
> >>Everyone has a line at which "I don't care what's in the pipes, I just
> >>work here" changes into something more actionable.
> >
> >Stretched far beyond any credibil
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Doug Barton said:
[..]
>>Everyone has a line at which "I don't care what's in the pipes, I just
>>work here" changes into something more actionable.
>
>Stretched far beyond any credibility. Your argument boils down to, "If it's
>a political thing
On 12/20/2016 8:08 AM, Royce Williams wrote:
n Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/16/2016 1:48 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
This started as a technical appeal, but:
https://www.nanog.org/list
1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues as
described
Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high
volume of traffic.+10Tbps
** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could
initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack.
We
Hello.
I'm Sho FUJIMURA.
I operate the public NTP Services as 133.100.9.2 and 133.100.11.8.
I'd like to reduce the traffic because I have trouble with too much
traffic recently.
So, I'm interested in the root of the the problem.
If possible, would you please tell me the model numbers of Tenda and
Hello,
I'm not sure i should continue to CC nanog, if someone interested to be
in CC for further updates this story please let me know.
TP-Link not related, it was misunderstanding or wrong customer report.
Tenda routers i believe most of cheap models are affected by this
problem.
On ISPs i
18 matches
Mail list logo
