In message <87twb4slol@mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes:
> * Mark Andrews:
>
> > The DNSSEC testing is also insufficient. 9-11commission.gov shows
> > green for example but if you use DNS COOKIES (which BIND 9.10.4 and
> > BIND 9.11.0 do) then servers barf and return BADVERS and val
PCCW might be a good choice given that Hong Kong is the gateway to China.
From: NANOG on behalf of John A. Kilpatrick
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 7:54 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: China to HK providers you like?
It's been a while since I've had to look
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> Consider that when we were announcing the whole /22 everything was working
> correctly, then suddenly some ASs stopped to accept our prefixes. That's why
> we decided to split the network and announce prefixes with different AS.
> Moreover the /23 ann
I tested from my home and happy eyeballs is not falling back to IPv4.
So, I tend to suspect that is not ICMPv6 filtering, but something else, such as
wrong load balancer or ECMP configuration.
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: NANOG en nombre de Carl Byington
Responder a:
Fecha
Thank you Massimiliano.
Consider that when we were announcing the whole /22 everything was working
correctly, then suddenly some ASs stopped to accept our prefixes. That's why we
decided to split the network and announce prefixes with different AS. Moreover
the /23 announced by AS2876 spreaded
It's been a while since I've had to look at mainland China connectivity -
what is the current situation for point-to-point business circuits from
China domestic locations to a datacenter in HK? Does anyone have
providers they like?
--
John A. Kilpatrick
j...@
Hi,
On 18/11/16 19:04, Giuseppe Spanò - Datacast Srl wrote:
> AS2876 announces 185.85.20.0/23
> AS207029 announces 185.85.22.0/23 (those prefixes are idle at the moment)
> It seems an AS filtering is acting somewhere, and this looks a bit weird to
> me.
> Did this ever happen to any of you? Do
> > I am working with pay.gov.c...@clev.frb.org, trying to explain the
> problem.
The intersection of government bureaucracy and technical issues is
frustrating to say the least. I just sent the message below, but have no
expectation that it will change anything.
==
On Fri, 2016-11
* Mark Andrews:
> The DNSSEC testing is also insufficient. 9-11commission.gov shows
> green for example but if you use DNS COOKIES (which BIND 9.10.4 and
> BIND 9.11.0 do) then servers barf and return BADVERS and validation
> fails. QWEST you have been informed of this already.
>
> Why the hell
Hi!
We are experiencing a strange issue with announcements from our AS207029.
On Sept. 16th we began to announce our prefixes 185.85.20.0/22 through our
upstream provider AS28716 (E-Planet). Everything worked correctly.
Suddenly during the night between 17th and 18th Sept. the visibility of thos
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.
> "Rod" == Rod Beck writes:
Rod> Hi,
Rod> I am trying to determine which undersea cables used for
Rod> London/Amsterdam traffic are the most reliable - fewest outages due to
Rod> shunt faults and other problems.
I'm surprised repeaters are needed at all, the Channel is not t
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why the hell should validating resolver have to work around the
crap you guys are using? DO YOUR JOBS which is to use RFC COMPLIANT
servers. You get PAID to do DNS because people think you are
compentent to do the job. Evidence shows otherwise.
https:/
On 11/17/16, Carl Byington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 15:32 -0500, Lee wrote:
>> That's fine, but until someone is willing to work with them don't
>> expect it to get fixed.
>
> I am working with pay.gov.c...@clev.frb.org, trying to explain
Hi Ronald,
You obviously managed to find us ;-)
All our contact details are on peeringdb.com, our corporate website, LinkedIn,
etc. We should be pretty easy to reach. The message you sent to our 24x7 NOC
was marked as “spam”, ironic.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention, we’ve asked th
Hi,
I am trying to determine which undersea cables used for London/Amsterdam
traffic are the most reliable - fewest outages due to shunt faults and other
problems.
Looks like most of the traffic traverses the following systems:
Farland North
UK-Netherlands
Ulysses
Circe North
Concerto
16 matches
Mail list logo
