Possibly somebody YANGed when they should have yinged :)
-mel beckman
On Oct 4, 2016, at 1:06 PM, Marco Teixeira
mailto:ad...@marcoteixeira.com>> wrote:
Yeap, i know, it was what i understood, as it is my opinion that a zero day
would fit better... in the pure speculation world :)
At the end
Yeap, i know, it was what i understood, as it is my opinion that a zero day
would fit better... in the pure speculation world :)
At the end of the day... maybe some undocumented fault int some obscure
functionality that was activated/deployed a long time ago, and just
revealed it self now... There
Just so. We are just speculating, but in light of recent GRE attack
developments, the ddos possibility is worth considering.
-mel beckman
On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:54 PM, Shawn Ritchie
mailto:shawnritc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Well, Level3 has by no means said that this was the result of a DDoS, tha
... but back then they didn't have ITIL and the likes (at least not that i
knew... but then again, i was just starting with networking back then),
where a ChM process must produce risk, impact, etc, reports, and at least
one peer review meeting for approval :)
=
Marco
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:33
I won't believe a company like Level3 would not deploy backplane
protection/policing on routers. Also, 1Tb/s aggregated DDoS towards OVH
network didn't pause or rebooted routers. And i guess both companies have
had their share of (D)DoS in the past, so they had the time to get up to
the challenge.
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:10:44 +0100, Marco Teixeira said:
> Had it been an approved chance it would have been
> rolled back i guess...
See the 1990 ATT long-distance collapse for a worked example.
pgp_Sro2vzM5h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
765 Gbps per second directed at a router’s interface IP might give the router
pause, so to speak :)
-mel
On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Marco Teixeira
mailto:ad...@marcoteixeira.com>> wrote:
Multiple reboots across several markets... Does not seem something that full
pipes would trigger. Had
Multiple reboots across several markets... Does not seem something that
full pipes would trigger. Had it been an approved chance it would have been
rolled back i guess... On the other hand, a zero day could apply...
Em 04/10/2016 19:54, "Mel Beckman" escreveu:
> Sure. The recent release of the I
Sure. The recent release of the IoT DDoS attack code in the wild.
-mel
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:42 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:14:54 -, Mel Beckman said:
>
>> This could be DoS attack.
>
> Or a missing comma in a code update.
>
> Or a fumble-fingered NOC
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:14:54 -, Mel Beckman said:
> This could be DoS attack.
Or a missing comma in a code update.
Or a fumble-fingered NOC monkey.
Or
You have any reason to suspect a DoS attack rather than all the other
possibilities?
pgp03Ijae5BSG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
We are seeing high latencies and loss of transit through Level3 in Southern
California.
Level 3 has opened Global Ticket 115724: Network devices in multiple markets in
North America are rebooting, impacting IP services.”
This could be DoS attack.
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Jason Hellenth
On 3 October 2016 at 22:09, Bryan Holloway wrote:
> We're in the market for a hand-held 10G ethernet tester, and I was curious
> if the NANOG community had any recommendations or experiences they would be
> willing to share, negative or positive.
What are you looking to test? Are you interested i
Patience Obi Wan ! They are investigating the root cause and like most root
causes they don’t just hold out a flag and say here I am !!!
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 10:32, Ivaylo Katovski wrote:
>
> When will L3 notify their customers for the outage?!? According to l3
> twitter account their are aware
When will L3 notify their customers for the outage?!? According to l3
twitter account their are aware of the voice impact and working on it
On Oct 4, 2016 11:03 AM, "Mark Stevens" wrote:
> Is anyone noticing issue with Level 3 voice? I can't even call their 800
> number using one of my other car
Boise Idaho is affected...
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+ascher=slhs@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Benjamin Hatton
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 9:04 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: Level 3 voice outage
Importance: High
WARNING: This email originated
There's all sorts of people online reporting problems with Level3 voice
services - we're down for outbound calling, inbound is spotty. Their portal is
unreachable, can't get to any of their #'s...seems like the world is on fire
over there.
We were a previous TW Telecom customer before Level3 b
We can't make any LD calls through Level3 either.
Thank you,
Shane Heupel
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Benjamin Hatton wrote:
>
> We just got a notification from one of our upstream Voice providers that
> they are seeing problems both inbound and outbound that seems to be Level 3
> related
>
Major Level 3 outage; they are currently not taking support calls.
On 10/4/16, 8:01 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Mark Stevens" wrote:
>Is anyone noticing issue with Level 3 voice? I can't even call their 800
>number using one of my other carriers.
>
>Mark
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Mark Stevens wrote:
Is anyone noticing issue with Level 3 voice? I can't even call their 800
number using one of my other carriers.
Yes, major outage:
http://downdetector.com/status/level3
Customers all over the mid-atlantic region are down.
JDSU 5800 series very user friendly... nice reports... VNC remote
connection so you can trigger test with out rolling a tech..
Robert Jacobs | Network Director/Architect
Direct: 832-615-7742
Main: 832-615-8000
Fax: 713-510-1650
5959 Corporate Dr. Suite 3300; Houston, TX 77036
A
(Interesting and inarguably well-intentioned, and possibly even sound, idea
snipped, but noted.)
There are a handful of reasons that this will never happen (well, I'm 98%
certain it will never happen, nothing is every 100% sure when it comes to the
law, and legislation)... among them the manufa
We are back in action here in MA.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of timrutherf...@c4.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:20 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Level 3 voice outage
Our upstream Voice provider is also having inbound issues with
Twitter is blowing up ( https://twitter.com/hashtag/outage ) and their
website (www.level3.com) is down for me so yeah... I'd say they're having a
frowny face day.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:20 AM, wrote:
> Our upstream Voice provider is also having inbound issues with numbers
> that were ported
Our provider is down as well. Saying Level 3 issues. Anyone know what's
going on or and ETR?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Kevin Kadow wrote:
> Level 3 has issues nationwide today. We have voice outages at our offices
> in multiple cities, Chicago and out west.
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:
Our upstream Voice provider is also having inbound issues with numbers that
were ported into their system, but the main trunk number is working.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+timrutherford=c4@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
Benjamin Hatton
Sent: Tuesday, October
There's a long thread over at the outages list. Sign-up for the outages
list is at https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages and the archive
for the whole thread starts at
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2016-October/009609.html.
Matt Freitag
Network Engineer I
Information Technol
Level 3 has issues nationwide today. We have voice outages at our offices
in multiple cities, Chicago and out west.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Mark Stevens wrote:
> Is anyone noticing issue with Level 3 voice? I can't even call their 800
> number using one of my other carriers.
>
> Mark
>
We just got a notification from one of our upstream Voice providers that
they are seeing problems both inbound and outbound that seems to be Level 3
related
*Ben Hatton*
Network Engineer
Haefele TV Inc.
d:(607)589-8000
bhat...@htva.net
www.htva.net
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Mark Steve
Is anyone noticing issue with Level 3 voice? I can't even call their 800
number using one of my other carriers.
Mark
We've used the Veex TX300 (now discontinued and replaced with the TX230S I
believe) and been satisfied. Our primary use is RFC 2544 testing, so I
don't know much about it's capabilities beyond that.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Dustin Jurman wrote:
> We utilize the EXFO product line and it's
We utilize the EXFO product line and it's a quality product.
Dustin
Dustin Jurman
CEO
Rapid Systems Corporation
1211 N. West Shore Blvd. Suite 711
Tampa, FL 33607
Ph: 813-232-4887
Cell: 813-892-7006
http://www.rapidsys.com
“Building Better Infrastructure”
-Original Message-
Fr
Could someone from AT&T please contact me off list?
Your residential Internet DNS servers are redirecting all traffic destined
for Akamai hosted sites to your homepage...
Thanks,
Ken
Yes, we have started the IPv6 enablement of our wireless network. West was
completed dual stack on Sept 29, Ontario will come next then east region.
Rogers Internet has completed all the IPv6 enablement. Fido Internet is
coming! Please email me directly for your IPv6 experience with Rogers.
We're in the market for a hand-held 10G ethernet tester, and I was
curious if the NANOG community had any recommendations or experiences
they would be willing to share, negative or positive.
Currently we're looking at the EXFO MAX-800 and NetScout's AT 10G, but
we're open to other suggestions.
34 matches
Mail list logo
