On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote:
Sorry to hear your legitimate users are impacted by captchas when trying to
use Google web search. This can happen when you have significant amounts
of abuse coming from your network. If switching to IPv4 means having more
users share IPs,
Hi,
L2VPN works also pretty well with the Extremes (X670). Only one thing doesn't
work: LACP BPDU forwarding for the customer. This is caused by the method how
Extreme let you configure the L2VPN on those small boxes.
best regards
Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure
ANEXIA Inter
On Tue Apr 12, 2016 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Colton Conor wrote:
> Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the more
> cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would have the
> most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
I'm using Extreme switches for VPLS - the X460
I like (sarcasm) how everybody here either wants to point fingers at MaxMind or
offer up coordinates to random places knowing that it will never happen. What
ever happened to holding people responsible for being stupid. When did it start
becoming ((fill in the blank)) coffee shop’s for you burni
Generic question.
Say you have a municipal provider in small town where the municipality
won the subsidy over the incumbent to deploy broadband.
The easiest is for the town's ISP to buy transit from the incumbent. But
incumbent will not be interested in offering competitive pricing.
As a sanity
On 13/Apr/16 02:29, Colton Conor wrote:
> Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the
> more cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would
> have the most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
>
> Cisco's MPLS switch is the ASR 920 right?
The useful ones a
Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the more
cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would have the
most cost effective 10G MPLS switch?
Cisco's MPLS switch is the ASR 920 right?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:13 PM, George, Wes
wrote:
>
> On 4/12/16,
All GeoIP services would be forced to document their default lat/long
values so that users know that when these values, they know it is a
generic one for that country. (or supply +181. +91.0 which is an
invalid value indicating that there is no lat/long, look at country code
given).
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 7:10 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-11 13:22, Ken Chase wrote:
>> Well they DO know the IP location is within the USA -
>
>
> A friend in Australia was with an ISP onwed by a US firm and his IP
> address often geolocated to the USA.
>
Similarly, IPv6 spac
Re: Sending police to middle of a lake..
Puts new meaning to a fishing expedition for police :-)
On 2016-04-11 13:34, Steve Mikulasik wrote:
> Mather says they’re going to change them. They are picking new default
> locations for the U.S. and Ashburn, Virginia that are in the middle of bodies
> of water,
Why not the White House or Wahington Monument ?
Or better yet, some large office comp
On 2016-04-11 13:22, Ken Chase wrote:
> Well they DO know the IP location is within the USA -
A friend in Australia was with an ISP onwed by a US firm and his IP
address often geolocated to the USA.
On 4/12/2016 08:31, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:10:44PM -0400, Sean Donelan
wrote:
If GeoIP insists on giving a specific lon/lat, instead of an uncertaintity
how about using locations such as the followign as the "default I don't
know where it is"
United
--- s...@donelan.com wrote:
From: Sean Donelan
https://fcw.com/articles/2016/04/11/lyngaas-halvorsen-update.aspx
-
Wow, this is big news in that article for the companies that
deal with selling network devices and computers to the DoD:
(Defense De
On 4/12/16, 9:22 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Tim Jackson"
wrote:
>>> (Broadcom chipset,
>> approach with caution).
>
>QFX5100 works fine for MPLS.. [snip] QFX5100 is a
>great P and lightweight PE..
WG] For some values of "fine" and "great" perhaps, but emphasis on the
"lightweight" is important, a
Guess what, an IG decides to count "data centers" using OMB's definition
of a data center. CIO points out those "data centers" won't save money.
https://fcw.com/articles/2016/04/11/lyngaas-halvorsen-update.aspx
The IG report knocked Halvorsen for not adjusting his strategy to account
for a re
Got this a few months ago, posting publically so it makes it into the archives
for the next guy.
> Thank you for contacting the AT&T Postmaster.
>
> We ne
On Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 14:04, "Colton Conor" said:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
The EXes can also run in a "fabric extender" mode to the MX (and others?).
Depending on geographical footpr
I know of a WISP in Puerto Rico that loves them.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Colton Conor"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:07:44 AM
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:55 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> Please don't guess (like, you know, MaxMind does.) USPS has its own
> database of all of the deliverable addresses in the country. They
> have their problems, but give or take data staleness as buildings
> are built or demolished, that's n
On 12/Apr/16 15:22, Tim Jackson wrote:
> QFX5100 works fine for MPLS.. ACX5k is QFX5100 hardware, but a
> different train of software, and it's a bit different. QFX5100 is a
> great P and lightweight PE..
As a P, fine (except if you're doing NG-MVPN, of course, which would
make it a poor branch
In a message written on Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:10:44PM -0400, Sean Donelan
wrote:
> If GeoIP insists on giving a specific lon/lat, instead of an uncertaintity
> how about using locations such as the followign as the "default I don't
> know where it is"
>
> United States: 38.8899 N, 77.0091 W (
I have two spam filters that relay outbound mail for a few dozen companies,
and as such generate a fair amount of traffic. We are fairly strict with
the spam filtering on outbound mail, but somehow end up blacklisted by
ATT/Prodigy/Bellsouth a few times a year.
>> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
>> multiple 10G ports on them.
>
> They do, but (deliberately) broken. I wouldn't try it.
EX4600 does MPLS just fine, nothing else really does in the EX
series.. EX4200 can do 1 label. The EX4600 featureset is pretty much
the
On 12/Apr/16 15:04, Colton Conor wrote:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them.
They do, but (deliberately) broken. I wouldn't try it.
> There is also the QFX series.
Not that I know of, but the ACX is a QFX-derivative (Broadcom c
I know the 4500/4550 does but it requires a license.
On Apr 12, 2016 8:07 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
> Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
> multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
Does anyone use Telco Systems Carrier Ethernet & MPLS Aggregation Switches?
I have heard good things about them. Overall, the saying is they price 10G
ethernet switches at 1G ethernet pricing. It looks like they support MPLS.
http://www.telco.com/index.php?page=product-category&category=ethernet-m
Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with
multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco 3600X
> series but the low density of 10g ports
In article <20160411191347.gc4...@excession.tpb.net> you write:
>* baldur.nordd...@gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl) [Mon 11 Apr 2016, 21:02 CEST]:
>>They should stop giving out coordinates on houses period. Move the
>>coordinate to the nearest street intersection if you need to be that
>>precise (I woul
29 matches
Mail list logo
