Mellanox 100GE switches

Does anyone have experiences they can share regarding the Mellanox 100GE Ethernet switches? Thanks! Jay

Re: Shared cabinet "security"

Well In Montreal, QC, CA... You can get Room, Cage, Full, 1/2, 1/4 or 1/8th from Metro Optic. You lose about 1U for the physical separation, but when you only need a few U's for a pair of routers... They also have connections with a local rack maker that can make you whatever you

Re: Fiber to the home specialists/consultants?

Diffraction? (i.e. Benoit Felten's company) http://www.diffractionanalysis.com/services/what-we-do On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Fletcher Kittredge wrote: > Since two asked: Tilson > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: > > > Ditto. > > On W

Re: NTT Charles

vBNS team--I remember them. Randy > On Feb 14, 2016, at 06:25, Dorian Kim wrote: > > AS2914 has a tradition of bidding farewell to technical team members who > move on via router dns record . Charles was one of our NOC engineers. > > IIRC, we stole this idea from the vBNS team back in the 90s.

Re: Automated alarm notification

OpenNMS has direct support for SNMP traps and multistage alerting. It's a pain in the ass to setup (depending on what you're doing*) but it's free and very high performance. * if all your MIBS are already supported then 90% of the work is done and it's not so bad. Just setup multistage alerts

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

In previous release 9.1(6) this line was ok: nat (inside,outside) source static obj-1.0.0.36_32 obj-1.0.0.36_32 destination static obj-1.0.0.36_32 obj-1.0.0.36_32 In 9.1.(7) wasn't working anymore, so the solution was to add *no-proxy-arp *at the end: nat (inside,outside) source static obj-1.0.0.3

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco ASA Software IKEv1 and IKEv2 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

Solved ! "Disable Proxy ARP" must be checked on NAT bypass rules (former nat 0). On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Adrian M wrote: > Be careful, It appears that something is broken with ARP on this release. > We have no ARP on lan interface, and somebody else has a similar problem: > > https://ww

Re: NTT Charles

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:22:31PM +0530, Anurag Bhatia wrote: > Very interesting. For how long does the record stays? :) For about a day. Kind regards, Job

Re: NTT Charles

Very interesting. For how long does the record stays? :) On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Dorian Kim wrote: > AS2914 has a tradition of bidding farewell to technical team members who > move on via router dns record . Charles was one of our NOC engineers. > > IIRC, we stole this idea from the vBN