IETF I-D: "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"

2016-02-05 Thread Fernando Gont
Folks, We have revised our IETF I-D "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers". The I-D is available at: Your feedback will be appreciated. If possible, please send your comments to: and CC . P.S.:

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread John Curran
On Feb 5, 2016, at 10:52 AM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: >> Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this >> change are? > > Hi Job, > > In layman's terms, the difference is that you're now free to deal with > the RPKI TA

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: > Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this > change are? Hi Job, In layman's terms, the difference is that you're now free to deal with the RPKI TAL the same way you deal with the legal issues surrounding access to A

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread John Curran
On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear John, > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +, John Curran wrote: >> One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the >> need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying >> party agreement (RP

Re: Cable Operator List

2016-02-05 Thread Colton Conor
Richard, Thanks for the information on these. Do you mind me asking what is a ballpark for these devices? From what I have read/heard, the Huawei D-CMTS was a 16x4 unit software upgradeable to 32x4 I thought. Is the one you have software upgradeable to 32x4? Are these DOCSIS 3.1 capable. Better y

Weekly Routing Table Report

2016-02-05 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists

Re: Change re ARIN RPKI Relying Party TAL access

2016-02-05 Thread Job Snijders
Dear John, On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +, John Curran wrote: > One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the > need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying > party agreement (RPA) - note that this has now been changed (per the > attached

Re: Arista optics

2016-02-05 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
We are having good luck with optics from OSI Hardware for Cisco, Juniper and Arista. They even had presence at NANOG65. I recommend. --Andrey On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:38 AM, J Crowe wrote: > *edit* be aware that if you are on the latest code revision 4.15.x that > you may have to manually r