The BCM88670 (Jericho) is what powers the new Cisco NCS55XX devices. The
processor is linerate above around 100 bytes per packet without external TCAM,
supports 256K IPv4/64K IPv6 FIB entries (or mixed amounts). These chips are
being used for high scale 100G, the initial NCS5508 linecard is a 3
On 18/Jan/16 01:15, Colton Conor wrote:
> Does anyone know when the switching and router vendors will release their
> new models with the Broadcom BCM88370 and BCM88670 chips? It looks like
> these chips could be used as a carrier grade router and/or metro E device.
>
> More information here: ht
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:40:17PM -0600, Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
>
> On 1/18/16 12:09 PM, Marc Storck wrote:
> >Yahoo is again "permanently" deferring mails with a persistent transient
> >(sic) failure codes.
> >
> >I followed all the instructions provided online, on and off-list.
> >
> >Not sure
Luma Optics in California has re-progammable transceivers along with a
coding platform called CLOUDCODE.
In addition to re-programming, the tool can also be used for DWDM tuning.
Eric
Luma Optics
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Colton Conor
wrote:
> What options are out there for re-programm
We have purchased a lot through the Solid-Optics US team. Very happy with their
pricing, reliability and support.
We have their multi-fiber tool and have reprogrammed optics as needed to go
between MFG equipment. I can only recommend that you give them a try.
Sincerely,
Nick Ellermann – CTO &
Eric,
If you’ve got something to relevant to add to the discussion, feel free to
reply to the list yourself. I’m not endorsing Menara’s pluggables any more
than I’m endorsing yours. I’m just simply stating that I’m aware that Menara
exists as a company. I took a quick look at your site and L
On January 18, 2016 at 00:21 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu)
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:39:52 -0500, b...@theworld.com said:
> > How about if backed by an agreement with the 5 RIRs stating no new
> > resource allocations or transfers etc unless a contract is signed and
http://precisionot.com/
I got to know about them at a MEF event and their transceiver line seems to be
very flexible.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 1:02 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Programmable SFP+ Tra
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers?
> So far I have found both
> https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and
> http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-too
What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers?
So far I have found both
https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and
http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-tool-id1768.html
Is there anything else out there? Any opinions on
On 1/18/16 12:09 PM, Marc Storck wrote:
Yahoo is again "permanently" deferring mails with a persistent transient (sic)
failure codes.
I followed all the instructions provided online, on and off-list.
Not sure what they expect operators to do in that case...
Regards, Marc
Yahoo is again "permanently" deferring mails with a persistent transient (sic)
failure codes.
I followed all the instructions provided online, on and off-list.
Not sure what they expect operators to do in that case...
Regards, Marc
Sent: Tuesday, January
Hello,
Don't suppose anyone has a contact for Verizon's e-mail department?
Filled out a request on their whitelist page, and they only checked the
last IP address in the list that I provided. Naturally, I responded
back with a copy of the reject showing that their system is blocking on
at le
13 matches
Mail list logo
