Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> Couldn't tell you:
>
> An error occurred while processing your request.
>
> Reference #50.b301e78e.1445526611.3125864
> Masataka: Is there an alt link? It sounds like it could be an
> interesting read.
Sorry, that should have been a temporally link and the permanent one
On 22/Oct/15 23:22, Bill Blackford wrote:
> I don't have all the details because I don't fully understand it, but
> I've heard that if you're running an MPLS/RSVP core, you can only use
> a single OSPF area. This introduces a scalability ceiling.
Not true.
The rate of development of advanced f
OK I will bite -
Yes, RIP everything and let'em all Rest-In-Peace.
My 0.02cents about OP's question-
"Scale" and Admin-headaches:
IS-IS scales far better than OSPF. Admin-headaches - as your OSPF domain grows,
do you want to continually re-design; create more areas? You definitely don't
want
It comes down to personal preference now days in my opinion. Both ISIS and
OSPFv3 allow you to run multi-af using the same protocol. Both of them dont
run full SPF when a stub network is added/removed (unlike OSPFv2). How
about vendor support? Perhaps ISIS has the upper hand here since its been
aro
In message <56295a09.5050...@cox.net>, Larry Sheldon writes:
>
> > Sitting in exactly the same position. IPv6 is great and all, but running
> > my business natively on IPv6 means nothing to me if my customers can't
> > reach me.
>
> Dang! It is a bloody shame that the PTB (or was it the Cabal?
On 22 October 2015 at 22:57, wrote:
> - Needing OSPFv3 for IPv6 when you're alredy running OSPFv2 for IPv4
> is less than optimal. I believe nowadays several vendors support
> OSPFv3 for both IPv4 and IPv6 - but this is not universal.
>
Our configuration is MPLS VPNv6 for IPv6. Therefore we have
Looks like XO is having an issue. Anything I have that routes through them in
Chicago is dropping but I don't see anyone talking about it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Gareth Tupper
> wrote:
>
> With TWC /XO, or just in general?
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Sitting in exactly the same position. IPv6 is great and all, but running
my business natively on IPv6 means nothing to me if my customers can't
reach me.
Dang! It is a bloody shame that the PTB (or was it the Cabal?) did not
see fit to tell us this might happen some day so we could have mad
With TWC /XO, or just in general?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mikeal Clark
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 12:44 PM
To: NANOG [nanog@nanog.org]
Subject: TWC / XO Chicago?
Anyone know what is going on?
This electronic mail transmissio
"marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr" writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some
> international ISP/carriers design choice,
Chris Knipe writes:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Clay Curtis wrote:
>
>> I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help
>> with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space
>> from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read abo
I don't have all the details because I don't fully understand it, but I've
heard that if you're running an MPLS/RSVP core, you can only use a single
OSPF area. This introduces a scalability ceiling.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Dave Bell wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 19:41, Mark Tinka w
You still have separate tables for IPv4 and IPv6 with isis and
multi-topology still runs 2 spf calculations.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:05 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The differences between the two protocols are so small, that people
> > really grasp at straws when 'proving' that one is better over
> > The differences between the two protocols are so small, that people
> > really grasp at straws when 'proving' that one is better over the
> > other. 'IS-IS doesn't work over IP, so its more secure'. 'IS-IS uses
> > TLVs so new features are quicker to implement'. While these may be
> > vaguely v
Hi,
> The differences between the two protocols are so small, that people
> really grasp at straws when 'proving' that one is better over the
> other. 'IS-IS doesn't work over IP, so its more secure'. 'IS-IS uses
> TLVs so new features are quicker to implement'. While these may be
> vaguely valid
On 22/Oct/15 21:35, Dave Bell wrote:
> I'm unsure if this is a serious argument, but its such a poor point
> today. Everything has to be connected to a level 2 in IS-IS. If you
> want a flat area 0 network in OSPF, go nuts. As long as you are
> sensible about what you put in your IGP, both IS-IS
Hi,
Looking for a company that has lots of experience with Cisco WiFi in
NYC. Our office deployment is struggling due to all of the interfering
APs, so we're looking for some outside help to assist us in improving
our coverage.
If you have any recommendations, please contact me off list.
Thanks
Anyone know what is going on?
On 22 October 2015 at 19:41, Mark Tinka wrote:
> The "everything must connect to Area 0" requirement of OSPF was limiting
> for me back in 2008.
I'm unsure if this is a serious argument, but its such a poor point
today. Everything has to be connected to a level 2 in IS-IS. If you
want a flat area
And Windows Server for your routing platform of choice!
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Damien Burke
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:12 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IGP choice
Just use rip for *everything*
Problem solved!
-Orig
Just use rip for *everything*
Problem solved!
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:41 AM
To: marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IGP choice
On 22/Oct/15 18:57, marcel.durega...@ya
On 22/Oct/15 18:57, marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what
> reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some
> international ISP/carri
* marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr (marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr) [Thu 22 Oct 2015, 18:57
CEST]:
Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
What a weird way to limit your audience. This is NANOG, not Yahoo.
Otherwise, http://userpages.umbc.edu/~vijay/work/ppt/oi.pdf
-- Niels.
Hi everyone,
Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some
international ISP/carriers design choice, please.
Thank in advance,
Best regards,
-Marce
On 10/22/2015 07:24 AM, Clay Curtis wrote:
I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help
with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space
from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read about secondary
markets, transfers, auction si
We recently went through this. After looking around for a bit I found good
prices with both IPTrading.com and IPv4Auctions.com. I ended up going with IPv4
auctions.com. The purchasing process was pretty painless, however before I did
that I went through the ARIN pre-approval process which was th
Couldn't tell you:
An error occurred while processing your request.
Reference #50.b301e78e.1445526611.3125864
Masataka: Is there an alt link? It sounds like it could be an interesting
read.
--
Hugo
h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber
PGP fingerprint (B178313E):
CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1
If you need it long term and can afford the upfront cost, there is
still plenty of space you can find for sale. If you are not quite sure
how long you will require it or are on a lower budget, leasing it
probably a better option.
-Alex
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Clay Curtis wrote:
> I wor
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Clay Curtis wrote:
> I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help
> with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space
> from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read about secondary
> markets, tran
I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help
with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space
from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read about secondary
markets, transfers, auction sites, leasing, etc. Can NANOG point me in the
Worth*
Thank you,
- Nich Warren
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Warren
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 7:26 AM
> To: Masataka Ohta
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: IPv6 Irony.
>
> Can anyone tell me if the document he link
Can anyone tell me if the document he linked is work reading? I am currently
connected to an IPv6 only network and can't get to it.
Thank you,
- Nich Warren
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:
32 matches
Mail list logo
