On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better
percentage legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network
range.
There are bound to be an awful lot of babies in that bathwater you're
planning to throw out.
You're certai
> As DE-CIX learned, NYC is a very difficult market to get connectivity
> and to build an exchange in. As such their operating costs are a lot
> higher than in other markets
circuits in the states are more painful than northern europe, japan,
etc. a bunch of smaller isps in the states were annoy
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> What are the main difference between these two peering companies,
> exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be
> Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering
> exchange with over 100 members,
On 22/Jul/15 15:48, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Why would people pay more to connect to an exchange with less members? What
> is the european exchange that is a non-profit and basically only covers the
> cost of operating the exchange?
My knee-jerk response would be that the big EU exchange points a
What are the main difference between these two peering companies,
exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be
Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering
exchange with over 100 members, and DE-CIX just announced today that that
would also be build
-- Forwarded message --
From: BSDCon Brasil 2015
Date: 2015-07-16 13:09 GMT-03:00
Subject: BSDCon Brasil 2015: Apresentações / Talks
To:
https://twitter.com/bsdcon_br/status/620727031630798852
= pt
Acompanhe as atualizações da conferência através do Twitter ou Facebook
(fb.
6 matches
Mail list logo
