> On May 27, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Harald Koch wrote:
>
> On 26 May 2015 at 11:32, Alex Brooks wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you not set account recory options which change the way password
>> reset requests are handled.
>> https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/183723 Gives some guidance?
>>
>> Alex
>
hello
what software do you use for looking glass. for cisco ios and ios-xr?
i use the old cougar/version6.net for ios, but ios-xr is not supported.
i came across https://github.com/tmshlvck/ulg/ but did't installed yet.
are there any other interesting lg's out there?
thanks.
--
Bogdan
Any feedback on the new 7250’s yet?
On 5/26/15, 3:02 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Chris Lane" wrote:
>We use Brocade ICX 6450s for this.
>
>-Chris
>
>On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Rohan wrote:
>
>> With the deluge of 10Gb X device recommendations, I thought I'd hit the
>> list with one
On 26 May 2015 at 11:32, Alex Brooks wrote:
>
> Can you not set account recory options which change the way password
> reset requests are handled.
> https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/183723 Gives some guidance?
>
> Alex
>
Unfortunately, setting these options does not disable the separat
Ignore my noise, I don't think there was new activity today (although
something weird def. happened). BGPmon list was sorted by wrong column
and I mixed the dates up. Although it's still showing as active since
march which I thought said provider resolved...
On 03/26/2015 8:26 pm, ML wrote
I guess AS18978 didn't learn from their mistake. Got a slew of
identical bgpmon alerts for withdrawals and more specifics within the
last 30 minutes. Worse than last time. Some still active, like:
update time (UTC) Update Type Probe ASn Probe Location Prefix
AS path Cleared
In message <20150526161151.ga14...@pob.ytti.fi>, Saku Ytti writes:
> On (2015-05-26 17:44 +0200), Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> > I think opt-out of password recovery choices on a line-item basis is not a
> bad concept.
>
> This sounds reasonable. At least then you could decide which balance
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, David Sotnick wrote:
> Hi NANOG,
>
> The company I work for has no business case for being on the IPv6-Internet.
> However, I am an inquisitive person and I am always looking to learn new
> things, so about 3 years ago I started down the IPv6 path. This was early
> 2012.
Hi NANOG,
The company I work for has no business case for being on the IPv6-Internet.
However, I am an inquisitive person and I am always looking to learn new
things, so about 3 years ago I started down the IPv6 path. This was early
2012.
Fast forward to today. We have a /44 presence for our comp
What are you thinking for connectivity, Ethernet, FiberChannel, Infiniband
... Building *Storage Nodes* or in need of just drive connectivity?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:53 PM
To: Graham Joh
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn
wrote:
>
> If they can e-mail you your existing password (*cough*Netgear*cough*),
> it means they are storing your credentials in the database
> un-encrypted.
>
No, it doesn't mean that at all. It means they are storing it unhashed
which is pro
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:59PM +, Graham Johnston wrote:
> I am looking for information about SAS drive enclosures, is there a
> list like NANOG that covers that area of IT?
>
> I am specifically looking for an enclosure that can handle 12 or more
> drives, I am looking to create a cluster
*facepalm*
Right. Sorry.
Forgot which group I was addressing. ;)
I swear half of the United States forgot their passwords over the
three-day weekend.
-A
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:39 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>> If they can e-mail you your existing password (*cough*Netgear*cough*),
>> it mea
If they can e-mail you your existing password (*cough*Netgear*cough*),
it means they are storing your credentials in the database
un-encrypted.
What I had in mind was creating a new password and mailing you that.
R's,
John
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:06 AM, John Levine wrote:
> If they do a reset, what difference does it make whether they send the
> password in plain text or as a one-time link? Either way, if a bad
> guy can read the mail, he can steal the account.
If they can e-mail you your existing password (*cou
I am looking for information about SAS drive enclosures, is there a list like
NANOG that covers that area of IT?
I am specifically looking for an enclosure that can handle 12 or more drives, I
am looking to create a clustered file system between multiple servers and would
like to avoid a drive
I would say these are what you are after, last time I tested these I seem to
remember Accedian coming out on top, but they are all good.
http://www.rad.com/10/Carrier-Ethernet-Demarcation/27932/
http://accedian.com/
http://www.mrv.com/products/carrier-ethernet
-Original Message-
From: NA
We use Brocade ICX 6450s for this.
-Chris
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Rohan wrote:
> With the deluge of 10Gb X device recommendations, I thought I'd hit the
> list with one more. Does anyone out there running 10Gb managed CPE feel
> like sharing their experiences?
>
> Our use case
With the deluge of 10Gb X device recommendations, I thought I'd hit the
list with one more. Does anyone out there running 10Gb managed CPE feel
like sharing their experiences?
Our use case would be a managed endpoint that would allow for testing and
circuit verification while providing a layer 2
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:15 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 19:11:51 +0300, Saku Ytti said:
>
>> > OTOH, recovery by receiving a token at a previously registered alternate
>> > email address
>> > seems relatively secure to me and I wouldn???t want to opt out of that.
>>
>> It's probably machin
On Tue, 26 May 2015 19:11:51 +0300, Saku Ytti said:
> > OTOH, recovery by receiving a token at a previously registered alternate
> > email address
> > seems relatively secure to me and I wouldn???t want to opt out of that.
>
> It's probably machine sent in seconds or minute after request, so doin
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Markus wrote:
> Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
> merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
> last login date (try "today")? What a joke.
We don't even know if this email originated by
I get what you are saying but my point was more about lack of crypto or
reversible crypto than stealing the account.
I am all in favor of using crypto when it improves security. But I am
also in favor of not obsessing about it in places where it makes no
difference.
I like what Owen is desc
On (2015-05-26 17:44 +0200), Owen DeLong wrote:
Hey,
> I think opt-out of password recovery choices on a line-item basis is not a
> bad concept.
This sounds reasonable. At least then you could decide which balance of
risk/convenience fits their use-case for given service.
> OTOH, recovery by r
I get what you are saying but my point was more about lack of crypto or
reversible crypto than stealing the account. I like what Owen is
describing, they should present all account recovery options and let the
user toggle on/off which ones they want to be usable this way the user can
make their own
In article
you write:
>Haha I cringe when I do a password recovery at a site and they either email
>the current pw to me in plain text or just as bad reset it then email it in
>plain text. Its really sad that stuff this bad is still so common.
If they do a reset, what difference does it make whe
Haha I cringe when I do a password recovery at a site and they either email
the current pw to me in plain text or just as bad reset it then email it in
plain text. Its really sad that stuff this bad is still so common.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > On May 26, 2015, a
> On May 26, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On (2015-05-26 16:26 +0200), Markus wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
>> merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
>
> Without any comment on wh
Perhaps this is still a void in the market? A business which operates small
officers at which you can real-world verify your personal being using the most
solid evidence available (perhaps in cooperation with governments) for that
location/country which works together with the sorts of big-@rand
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Markus wrote:
> Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
> merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
> last login date (try "today")? What a joke.
Can you not set account recory options whic
On (2015-05-26 16:26 +0200), Markus wrote:
Hey,
> Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
> merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
Without any comment on what gmail is or is not doing, the topic interests me.
How should re
Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail
account merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is
sufficient) and the last login date (try "today")? What a joke.
Try it by yourself, its "fun".
Even worse, once the attacker had control of your account once, and
32 matches
Mail list logo
