We've been using Dell 8024F's for over 2 years now. No problems at all.
On 12/05/2015 23:36, Paul S. wrote:
Hi guys,
We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering
what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
It is my understanding that low buffer sizes make most
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:09:23PM -0400, Michael Brown wrote:
> Yes - is this "flex reach" wireless/4G?
>
> I've observed past behaviour of image and page content "optimization" (i.e.
> minifying, recompression) that causes problems for a site over this type of
> connection when using plaintex
Sorry I must have mixed up AT&T terms. We have a 20Mbit symmetric circuit
that's also serves up VoIP. Not sure what AT&T calls it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
>
> Yes - is this "flex reach" wireless/4G?
>
> I've observed past behaviour of image an
Yes - is this "flex reach" wireless/4G?
I've observed past behaviour of image and page content "optimization" (i.e.
minifying, recompression) that causes problems for a site over this type of
connection when using plaintext.
M.
Original Message
From: Paul Lam
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1
Hello all,
Wondering if anyone has encountered an issue where a website
will load over https, but will only partially load over http using the same WAN
connection. We are currently experiencing this behavior loading up a website
hosted in AWS over an AT&T Flex reach service in
To some extent people are comparing apples (not TM) and oranges.
Are you trying to maximize the number of total cores or the number of
total computes? They're not the same.
It depends on the job mix you expect.
For example a map-reduce kind of problem, search of a massive
database, probably is
- On May 12, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Paul S. cont...@winterei.se wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering
> what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
>
> It is my understanding that low buffer sizes make most 'normal' 10G
> ethernet sw
We use IBM / Lenovo switches for such traffic. Very low latency, rear to
front or front to rear airflow models, large buffers, FCoE, OpenFlow
support, great price-performance...
G8124E or G8272 may be the right models, use DAC cables instead of SFP+ if
possible.
Lumir
From: "Paul S."
I am using Brocade VDX 6740 switches that support dcbx. They work very well and
have had no issues in nearly two years with them.
Thank you,
Jordan Medlen
Network Engineer
Bisk Education, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Paul S.
Sent: T
Here's someone's comparison between the B and B+ in terms of power:
http://raspi.tv/2014/how-much-less-power-does-the-raspberry-pi-b-use-than-the-old-model-b
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Joel Maslak wrote:
> Rather then guessing on power consumption, I measured it.
>
> I took a Pi (Model B
Paul S. schreef op 12-5-2015 om 15:36:
> Hi guys,
>
> We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering
> what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
In one location a HP Procurve 8212zl with 8 SFP+ module, and a 8Gbe
module. Here i'm using a Dell EQL PS6210 SSD cabine
I use a ex4550 VC as our TOR for our ESXi / EQL array in one spot, and a
pair of QFX5100-48S in another.
No issues here with either of them. The 5100¹s have a possibility of being
comparable in price once you add in the VC cards and so forth for a pair
of 4550¹s. I would get a quote for them both
/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator/blob/master/rpki-validator-app/README.txt#L185
Here's a link to a snapshot I just made:
https://alexband.nl/temp/export-20150512.rpsl.zip
You can download the RPKI Validator here:
https://ripe.net/certification/tools-and-resources
We look forward to your feedback. Pul
Hi guys,
We're shortly going to be getting some 10G SANs, and I was wondering
what people were using as SAN switches for 10G SANs.
It is my understanding that low buffer sizes make most 'normal' 10G
ethernet switches unsuitable for the job.
We're pretty much an exclusive Juniper shop, but a
14 matches
Mail list logo