On 28/Apr/15 03:33, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> I am not looking for bulk feeds of content for me to redistribute
> using conventional infrastructure as I don't have any at this point.
> As the network this would be going into is greenfield, I have little
> desire to run a conventional RF netw
I believe Vubiquity (http://www.vubiquity.com/product-portfolio/livevu/) does,
as well as Comcast HITS
(http://www.comcastwholesale.com/products-services/mpeg-2-content-delivery/mpeg-2-delivery-content-providers).
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On
Roy:
Thanks.
I seek information from people that have already done this kind of thing
before. Admittedly, this may be lower down the OSI model than many of them
go, but there are some lurkers among the bunch.
So, re-phrased, I would ask "What are industry standard, best practices when
Having seen my share of pesky vendors - though not this one .. Yeah idle
speculation it is. Informed idle I hope. :)
--srs
> On 28-Apr-2015, at 9:00 am, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> Have you gotten a copy too, or are you just idly speculating here?
On 04/27/2015 08:30 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
though a remarkably persistent one to one, I would suggest procmail,
unless you know heâ(TM)s harvested nanog and is sending the same
offer mail merged to a bunch of operators.
Gee, it's almost as if by posing a ques
Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
> Given weâ(TM)re going down this âoewhat is spamâY\.. rathole again, spam is
> generally defined as unsolicited BULK email
Correct, and moreover it's generally conceded that having a perl
script insert "Dear Robert" at the beginning of the email message is
insuff
Given we’re going down this “what is spam” rathole again, spam is generally
defined as unsolicited BULK email
As the email appears to be one to one, though a remarkably persistent one to
one, I would suggest procmail, unless you know he’s harvested nanog and is
sending the same offer mail merge
Stephen Satchell writes:
> On 04/27/2015 07:02 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>> Anyone else been spammed by Andy Boland at "Function5 Technology
>> Group"?
>
> I'm not sure it's fair to class the e-mail as "spam", but he is one
> persistent fellow. My company made list for some of the equipment we
>
On 04/27/2015 07:02 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Anyone else been spammed by Andy Boland at "Function5 Technology
Group"?
I'm not sure it's fair to class the e-mail as "spam", but he is one
persistent fellow. My company made list for some of the equipment we
retired for purchase, and his Cisco bu
Anyone else been spammed by Andy Boland at "Function5 Technology
Group"?
-r
On 04/27/2015 09:08 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
Brandon Martin writes:
Anyone know of an IPTV provider/wholesaler who I could meet in
Indianapolis (Henry St/Lifeline) or Chicago (Cermak/Equinix)?
"IPTV" implies, or used to imply, multicast (or unicast, whichever,
swap them with a few DCMs) MPEG
Did you check the map listings over at Telecom Ramblings?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Eric C. Miller"
To: "NANOG (nanog@nanog.org)"
Sent: Monday,
Also Internexa:
http://www.internexa.com/en-us/Pages/home.aspx
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-04-27 21:32 GMT-03:00 Rubens Kuhl :
> Level 3 wholesale (former Global Crossing), Telefónica Wholesale, Tata
> Communications(former Teleglobe) and LANautilus(TI/Sparkle).
> Possible local providers could b
Brandon Martin writes:
> Anyone know of an IPTV provider/wholesaler who I could meet in
> Indianapolis (Henry St/Lifeline) or Chicago (Cermak/Equinix)?
"IPTV" implies, or used to imply, multicast (or unicast, whichever,
swap them with a few DCMs) MPEG2-TS feeds. If that's what you want,
fine,
I have these guys as contacts for that sort of service. It was reasonably
priced. They even had a "when you approach 1k customers, you can move to this
other system" option. Someone that has small guys in mind is rare.
"Emily" < emily.c...@mwt.net >
Emily Call
Midwest Video Solutions
608-6
Level 3 wholesale (former Global Crossing), Telefónica Wholesale, Tata
Communications(former Teleglobe) and LANautilus(TI/Sparkle).
Possible local providers could be TelcoNet (private) or CNT
(government-owned).
Rubens
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Eric C. Miller
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Anyone know of an IPTV provider/wholesaler who I could meet in
Indianapolis (Henry St/Lifeline) or Chicago (Cermak/Equinix)?
Direct solicitations are OK out-of-band.
--
Brandon Martin
Hello,
Does anyone have a recommendation for a provider who can service the west coast
of Ecuador at speeds 100Mbps - 1Gbps?
Thanks!
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
Seeking to make contact with somebody in Cisco Tacops please. Any help would be
appreciated, not sales related, would like to lend a hand with current ops.
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG wrote:
>
> http://postmaster.yahoo.com will allow you to contact the postmaster team for
> assistance.
> I've reported this error already, but fixing it won't help you any;
> basically, the web page without the link is all Yahoo's willing
--- Begin Message ---
http://postmaster.yahoo.com will allow you to contact the postmaster team for
assistance.
I've reported this error already, but fixing it won't help you any; basically,
the web page without the link is all Yahoo's willing to publicly say about that
error message, you'll nee
One of our user’s e-mail messages to Yahoo bounced with the following link for
more information: http://postmaster.yahoo.com/errors/postmaster-27.html
which redirects to
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN5067.html?impressions=true
That page contains a link to “Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Messe
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:52:28PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
> I've also cc'ed Leo and Michelle from ICANN so that hopefully they
> can see about getting some whois info set up for that network.
> Michelle, let me know if it would be easier for you if I opened a
> ticket for this reque
It's rare that NANOG is speechless on an issue. Have I stumped the experts?
:)
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
lor...@hathcock.org
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 10:53 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: FW: OSP multi-fiber Network-to Network Inter
24 matches
Mail list logo
