[ reposted from subscribed address ]
anyone on fios/frontier can please run a quickie and see if you can get
to http://psg.com/? have a net friend who can not from multiple hosts
on their home lan and he has rebooted router. called support and they
showed their sunday best "the web site is down
anyone on fios/frontier can please run a quickie and see if you can get
to http://psg.com/? have a net friend who can not from multiple hosts
on their home lan and he has rebooted router. called support and they
showed their sunday best "the web site is down." sigh.
randy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/Apr/15 08:32, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> Mark, you realize that this is what NANOG will make sure is engraved
on your headstone, right?
Only if I expire :-)...
Mark.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVNJ6JAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GvuwP/1RNI9
> On Apr 19, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> The age of the Ethernet switch has little to do with its performance,
> unless it has everything to do with its performance.
Mark, you realize that this is what NANOG will make sure is engraved on your
headstone, right?
At 17:22 18/04/2015 +, Colin Bodor wrote:
Maybe https://arin.net/resources/whowas/index.html would work?
As per a question I asked 2 years ago and the response I received from
ARIN - "I have confirmed that Whowas reports only go back to conversion in
2002 (when Org IDs were created and a
> On Apr 19, 2015, at 6:09 AM, William Waites wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:23:53 +0200, Baldur Norddahl
> said:
>
>> So why is IX peering so expensive?
>
>> But the only service is running an old layer 2 switch.
>
>> The 40 dix particants should donate 1000 USD once and get a new
>> l
Ok I've got a few comments offlist too and they all seem to draw the same
conclusion - crimp your own length. Thanks all for the input.
On Apr 17, 2015 4:11 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Joe McLeod wrote:
> > Or you build the cable to fit the span. I must be get
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:03:02PM -0600, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> >> It's reported by different customers in different locations so I don't
> >> think it's password compromised
>
> >Have you checked? If the routers had vty access open (ssh or telnet) and
> >the passwords were easy to guess, then i
On 19/Apr/15 11:23, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> So why is IX peering so expensive?
>
> Again if I look at my local IX (dix.dk) they have about 40 networks
> connected. Each network pays minimum 5800 USD a year. That gives them a
> budget of 24+ USD a year.
>
> But the only service is running an
Maybe https://arin.net/resources/whowas/index.html would work?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of shawn wilson
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 11:04 AM
To: Roy
Cc: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: Historical records of POCs
Asked
Getting networks to connect to an ix is Uber expensive in relation to the
overall costs. Specifically before critical mass is reached. Getting the
first X gig of traffic is a hard problem that takes money to fix.
On Apr 19, 2015 7:51 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> There is a revenue floor where it d
There is a revenue floor where it doesn't matter how much or how little service
is provided, simply having a customer period requires a certain amount of
revenue.
Route servers, IXP Manager, AS112, route collectors, DNS, etc. all cost money.
Maintenance costs money. The organization itself co
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:23:53 +0200, Baldur Norddahl
said:
> So why is IX peering so expensive?
> But the only service is running an old layer 2 switch.
> The 40 dix particants should donate 1000 USD once and get a new
> layer 2 switch. Why does that not happen?
This is somethi
So why is IX peering so expensive?
Again if I look at my local IX (dix.dk) they have about 40 networks
connected. Each network pays minimum 5800 USD a year. That gives them a
budget of 24+ USD a year.
But the only service is running an old layer 2 switch.
Why do these guys deserve to be paid
14 matches
Mail list logo
