Inoc-dba?
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em sexta-feira, 3 de abril de 2015, Joe escreveu:
> Maybe - 1 (650) 253-? At least that what comes up when I google
> google for google's phone numberOf course the more apparent course
> of action would be to follow the directions and contact your ISP.I
>
On 2015-04-03 14:18, Chris Boyd wrote:
Can we please get back to the original topic?
So far we have had one interesting and useful suggestion that I've
seen -- Paul S. mentioned SIR https://github.com/dbarrosop/sir
Have I missed any other solutions other than the prefix length
filtering?
I
The number of infected hosts out there is just astounding. I have bots
attacking a server from all over the world. Lots of them from a network
known as micfo. I could write abuse complaints from here until doomsday
and I'd never be done.
--Curtis
--
Best Regards
Curtis Maurand
Principal
Xy
The SIR approach might not work if your switch does not support selective
installing routes. Also the switch might have a very slow CPU and be memory
constrained, making downloading a large number of routes impractical even
if you do not install all.
IX and transit providers are making this harder
On 04/03/2015 12:18 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
Can we please get back to the original topic?
Also interested in the original topic.
So far we have had one interesting and useful suggestion that I've
seen -- Paul S. mentioned SIR https://github.com/dbarrosop/sir
>
Have I missed any other solution
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Fred Hollis wrote:
> I need contact to a Google network Admin as well. Having some serious issues
> with our clients reaching Google services.
it always helps to provide more data in your request ...
On 3 April 2015 at 22:53, Matt Palmer wrote:
> Or, to answer your question more simply: "No".
>
That completely mischaracterizes my answer.
>
> - Matt
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:39:36AM +0100, Pedro Cavaca wrote:
> > https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640?hl=en
> >
> > On 3 Apri
I need contact to a Google network Admin as well. Having some serious
issues with our clients reaching Google services.
On 03.04.2015 at 23:53 Matt Palmer wrote:
Or, to answer your question more simply: "No".
- Matt
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:39:36AM +0100, Pedro Cavaca wrote:
https://suppor
Maybe - 1 (650) 253-? At least that what comes up when I google
google for google's phone numberOf course the more apparent course
of action would be to follow the directions and contact your ISP.I
highly doubt they'd be trying to block some IP address that's close to
yours and accidentally
BGP Update Report
Interval: 26-Mar-15 -to- 02-Apr-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS4837 703462 11.0% 149.4 -- CHINA169-BACKBONE CNCGROUP
China169 Backbone,CN
2 - AS7782
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 3 21:14:33 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Or, to answer your question more simply: "No".
- Matt
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:39:36AM +0100, Pedro Cavaca wrote:
> https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640?hl=en
>
> On 3 April 2015 at 04:53, Randy wrote:
>
> > I've started to get some message today from google claiming that my
> >
> ...if not then country bans are in place and will
> remain in place until culture change is done
: I would like country trade talks to get down to the
: technical point that there are some fundamental
: problems being seen with bad traffic usage and it is
: significant percentage of waste
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:08:40 -0700, goe...@anime.net said:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Barry Shein wrote:
> > On April 2, 2015 at 14:19 goe...@anime.net (goe...@anime.net) wrote:
> > > a number of years back i did have someone contact in chinese and the
> > > response was that the customer was doing noth
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Barry Shein wrote:
On April 2, 2015 at 14:19 goe...@anime.net (goe...@anime.net) wrote:
> a number of years back i did have someone contact in chinese and the
> response was that the customer was doing nothing wrong.
Ok, that's progress of a sort, what's the authoritative sour
Can we please get back to the original topic?
So far we have had one interesting and useful suggestion that I've seen -- Paul
S. mentioned SIR https://github.com/dbarrosop/sir
Have I missed any other solutions other than the prefix length filtering?
--Chris
Gentlemen, be happy
Roderick Beck
Sales Director/Europe and the Americas
Hibernia Networks
http://www.hibernianetworks.com
Budapest and New York
36-30-859-5144
rod.b...@hibernianetworks.com
This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and
china says not a problem since they have head in sand and ignore cooperation
phone contact with chinse folks does not help either
colin
Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Apr 2015, at 19:51, Barry Shein wrote:
>
>
>> On April 3, 2015 at 20:22 baconzom...@gmail.com (Bacon Zombie) wrote:
>> Is port sca
portscanning on mass scale where unable to get knowledgable network/sysadmins
to fix gets to the point of every part of large network ranges are affected.
then country blocks make sense to protect countries from armies of exploited
machines and protect valuable costly network resource
colin
Se
On April 3, 2015 at 20:22 baconzom...@gmail.com (Bacon Zombie) wrote:
> Is port scanning illegal in China?
>
> If not the there is no reason for then to do anything about it.
I don't think that's a minimal standard one has to use, illegal or
not.
Management of the internet infrastructure is
Is port scanning illegal in China?
If not the there is no reason for then to do anything about it.
On 3 Apr 2015 19:00, "Barry Shein" wrote:
>
> On April 2, 2015 at 14:19 goe...@anime.net (goe...@anime.net) wrote:
> > a number of years back i did have someone contact in chinese and the
> > res
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For hi
On April 2, 2015 at 14:19 goe...@anime.net (goe...@anime.net) wrote:
> a number of years back i did have someone contact in chinese and the
> response was that the customer was doing nothing wrong.
Ok, that's progress of a sort, what's the authoritative source of
right and wrong, something bey
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640?hl=en
On 3 April 2015 at 04:53, Randy wrote:
> I've started to get some message today from google claiming that my
> computer or network was sending automated queries, and they are blocking me.
> I'm not sending automated queries, Ive logged all
24 matches
Mail list logo
