BGP Update Report
Interval: 15-Jan-15 -to- 22-Jan-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS38623 2053233 30.3%8927.1 -- VIETTELCAMBODIA-AS-AP ISP/IXP
IN CAMBODIA WITH THE BEST VER
This report has been generated at Fri Jan 23 21:14:26 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
> Got a customer that needs a /25 block routed to him, was approved for
> "125" IPs, but they refuse to route a block to the customer. Any
> assistance, please hit me off-list, dmburg...@linktechs.net
That's just how Verizon does things. Oft
Don't they just say: "125 ips" and route (they used to) each /32 to
the VC that represnets the customer in question... They don't actually
route a /25, they route the individual /32's to the LAN that is
presented on the end of the fiber.
good luck!
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Dennis Burgess
Got a customer that needs a /25 block routed to him, was approved for
"125" IPs, but they refuse to route a block to the customer. Any
assistance, please hit me off-list, dmburg...@linktechs.net
Thanks,
www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 - dmburg...@linktechs.net
Correct link for Cisco is updated below.
John
From: , John Brzozowski
mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com>>
Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 12:14
To: NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Subject: Comcast Support (from NANOG Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23)
Folks,
The thread below was sent to me a few
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For hi
Sadly, you don't have to pass any sort of "clue" test to peer in the
default-free zone and there are plenty of organizations who simply don't
filter properly.
Worse yet, it's still illegal to use the bright platinum baseball bat of
clue on the perpetrators. ;-)
--
John Fraizer
LinkedIn profile: ht
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 05:55:26 PM ML wrote:
> There are sloppy networks out there. If it was a big
> enough problem all you'd need is a few key networks drop
> those prefixes and we'd have a...slightly less sloppy
> Internet?
Router software (speaking of Cisco and Juniper in this case)
Folks,
The thread below was sent to me a few times, apologies for not catching it
sooner.
Janet,
I sent you mail unicast with a request for some information. I am happy to
help you out.
For the larger NANOG audience, Comcast has recently launched IPv6 support for
our BCI products, these are
> On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:27, George, Wes wrote:
>
> We've seen 3 or 4 recent presentations of some new measurement project
> that requires deploying yet another set of dedicated probes. While I'm
> generally supportive of measurement attempts, I'll ask the same question
> that was asked then:
Th
11 matches
Mail list logo
