>Once you get tired of spending expensive labor time on this project, you can
>throw some
>grad students, xboxes and scapy in a room and have them automate the process
>for
Actually, this is exactly what we do now .. we host LAN parties (usually right
after Christmas when new games come out)
Dear NANOG,
We are currently looking for volunteers in US with native IPv6 lines
to help us in our v6 measurement research.
<——-- Background
We are interested in measuring IPv6 performance from home. As part
of the LEONE project [1], we have developed measurement tests that
compare performanc
Cruel, cruel man.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>
> SSL is no problem. We just had a whole thread about breaking it. :-)
>
>
>> On January 19, 2015 5:16:43 PM CST, George Herbert
>> wrote:
>> Emulating game traffic... Good
Ixia is very very expensive and has its own sets of "fun", though it is a nice
appliance for playing with packets. Though its more for protocol compliance
testing and load generation.
You'll find that protocol exploration and... h... exploitation is an
incredibly mature field in floss.
ht
As a zenoss plugin, I agree.
On January 19, 2015 7:22:36 PM CST, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
>On 20 Jan 2015, at 5:10, Michael O Holstein wrote:
>
>> I need something that emulates the actual game traffic as would be
>> classified by all the network crap that endeavors to mess with it.
>
>That soun
SSL is no problem. We just had a whole thread about breaking it. :-)
On January 19, 2015 5:16:43 PM CST, George Herbert
wrote:
>Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have
>to figure it out and build your own models per service, though a lot is
>encapsulated in https.
On 1/17/15, 7:15 PM, "Saku Ytti" wrote:
>On (2015-01-17 12:02 +0100), Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
>
>> Our experience after 100 days of production is only the best - TRILL
>>setup
>> is pretty straightforward and thanks to IS-IS it provides shortest-path
>> IP-like "routing" for L2 ethernet packet
On 20 Jan 2015, at 5:10, Michael O Holstein wrote:
I need something that emulates the actual game traffic as would be
classified by all the network crap that endeavors to mess with it.
That sounds like a great open-source project - let us know when you're
done!
;>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Grant Ridder
wrote:
> It looks like Websense might do decryption (
> http://community.websense.com/forums/t/3146.aspx) while Covenant Eyes
> does some sort of session hijack to redirect to non-ssl (atleast for
> Google) (https://twitter.com/CovenantEyes/status/45
IXIA would be the first product to look at as far as emulating traffic.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:16 PM, George Herbert
wrote:
> Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have
Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have to figure
it out and build your own models per service, though a lot is encapsulated in
https.
In terms of showing it to the public, look at Zabbix and Zenoss; both do
dashboards and managing multiple realtime monitoring / pe
Hi Michael,
I don't have a direct answer to your question, nor can I speak for other
gaming companies, but I can certainly work with you off-list on ways to
monitor connectivity and performance to our game, "League of Legends".
Hopefully also find some ways to optimise routing between our networks
BFD etc aim to prove there is end-to-end connectivity between two
points, not just that all links are up along the path. All ports could
be up, but end-to-end connectivity broken, for example a misconfigured
VLAN across a L2 network. Sending some kind of packet across the
network is pretty much the
?Can someone point me in the right direction for something that allows creation
of a "dashboard" with current and statistical latency to the various game
servers (PC, Xbox, PS4, etc) ? .. I'm in the education space and we get lots of
questions/complains about this and would like a way to make th
Hi,
Routers connected back to back often rely on BFD for link failures. Its
certainly possible that there is a switch between two routers and hence a
link down event on one side is not visible to the other side. So, you run
some sort of an OAM protocol on the two routers so that they can detect
li
>We use Fortinet firewalls and SSL (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POP3S, SMTPS,
>SSH) inspection is a standard feature. It works by rolling out a custom
>CA certificate from the device to all of the desktops and whenever you
>hit a SSL site, a cert signed with the CA is generated and presented to
>the u
In article <54bcc924.1000...@cox.net> you write:
>On 1/18/2015 12:55, John R. Levine wrote:
>> There are also ISPs that provide intrusive filtering as a feature. I
>> wouldn't use one, but I know people who do, typically members of
>> conservative religious groups.
>
>Can you provide credible evid
I have discovered that some emails are disappearing inside gmail.
I have logs of one such email that disappeared. It shows the 250 reply
from google, but email doesn't get to inbox or spam filter.
Looking for assistance from Gmail.
Thanks,
Lyle Giese LCR Computer Services, Inc.
So with this 3 line connection, what speeds up and down are you getting?
You say 10X10 which I find odd for a 3 line bonded VDSL2 connection. Most
always your downstream will be much higher than your upstream on a 868
unit.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Stetson Blake <
stetson.bl...@datayardw
On 19/01/2015 10:12, Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
> Thus if you use VPLS or SPB-M on Trident HW, the egress PE doesn't support
> per-flow loadbalancing on IXP participants' LAGs.
not completely true. Extreme XOS has an interesting hack to work around this.
Nick
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:15:04PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2015-01-17 12:02 +0100), Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
>
> > Our experience after 100 days of production is only the best - TRILL setup
> > is pretty straightforward and thanks to IS-IS it provides shortest-path
> > IP-like "routing" for
On 1/18/2015 12:55, John R. Levine wrote:
There are also ISPs that provide intrusive filtering as a feature. I
wouldn't use one, but I know people who do, typically members of
conservative religious groups.
Can you provide credible evidence to support "typically members of
> conservative relig
On 1/18/2015 12:41, Teleric Team wrote:
Honestly, don't do this. Neither option.You can still have some
control over SSL access with ordinary domain based filtering getting
proxied, via CONNECT method or sorta. You don't need filtering
capabilities over full POST/DELETE/UPDATE HTTP methods, and i
23 matches
Mail list logo
