> On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Justin M. Streiner
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
>
>> Is it unrealistic to hope for enough salesmen pressure on the corporate
>> ladder to make such moronic attitude be reversed in the short term ?
>
> No salesperson is likely to do th
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> because a /23 of ipv6 is very large :)
That’s a good reason not to use a /23, but not a good reason not to use IPv6.
>
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> #fios
>
No it’s not
Hi all,
Sorry for the noise, but my emails to postmas...@charter.net are getting
rejected. Our mail server is being rejected by charter.net for not having
a reverse DNS PTR record, but all the publicly available DNS servers I am
able to query are resolving the PTR without any errors.
If anyone h
Ressurecting this thread: GIGLINX is still at it.
They contacted me on an email that was only ever used for registering an
ASN with ARIN.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:14 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> > The usual method is to insert "ringers" which wo
On 11/29/14, 3:17 PM, "John Levine" wrote:
>PS: I know enough technical people at Comcast that I would be
>extremely surprised if it were Comcast doing this. There's plenty not to
>like about the corporation, but the technical staff are quite competent.
Thanks, John! I can tell folks here unequ
On 11/29/14, 12:26 PM, "Jean-Francois Mezei"
wrote:
>However, in the case of SMTP, due to the amount of spam, most ISPs break
>"network neutrality" by blocking outbound port 25 for instance
Whatever Net Neutrality may mean this week, it is usually intended to
allow for reasonable network managem
6 matches
Mail list logo
