On 11/21/14 11:42 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
> But I am buying 1 Gig on a 1 Gig circuit. I could see if it were
> burstable but it was being billed as 1Gig on a Gig circuit.
If you're buying 1Gig commit then you're buying 1gig commit.
That's not the contract you described.
> Justin
>
>
> --
> J
On 11/22/2014 11:18 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2014-11-22 18:00, freed...@freedman.net wrote:
We see a lot of Brocade for switching in hosting providers, which makes
sFlow easy, of course.
Oh, Brocade, recent experience with ServerIron taught me new lesson,
that i can't
do bonding on p
On 2014-11-22 18:00, freed...@freedman.net wrote:
> Cisco ASRs and MXs with inline jflow can do hundreds of K flows/second
> without affecting packet forwarding.
Yes, i agree,those are good for netflow, but when they already exist
in
network.
Does it worth to buy ASR, if L3 switch already doi
> > Cisco ASRs and MXs with inline jflow can do hundreds of K flows/second
> > without affecting packet forwarding.
>
> Yes, i agree,those are good for netflow, but when they already exist in
> network.
>
> Does it worth to buy ASR, if L3 switch already doing the job
> (BGP/ACL/rate-limit/routin
> > On the contrary - SPAN nee port mirroring cuts into the
> > frames-per-second budget of linecards, as the traffic is in essence
> > being duplicated. It is not 'free', and it has a profound impact on
> > the the switch's data-plane traffic forwarding capacity.
> >
> > Unlike NetFlow.
>
> In
5 matches
Mail list logo
