Anyone have contact information for Mediastream/Vyve Broadband NOC?
Luke Parrish | Network Operations Engineer I | Suddenlink Communications |
866.232.5455
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may co
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
>
> this is kind of incident handling 101 and shouldn't be surprising to anyone.
There’s always people who feel “left out of the loop” when these things occur.
I’ve found
there’s no one location for centralized data after many years of doing
On 10/01/2014 02:59 PM, Todd Underwood wrote:
read: http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html
they have a sensible, commonly used security policy that involves private
notification to large customers in advance where it is practical and there
is not evidence of ongoing exploits in the wild
read: http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html
they have a sensible, commonly used security policy that involves private
notification to large customers in advance where it is practical and there
is not evidence of ongoing exploits in the wild.
this is kind of incident handling 101 and sho
On 01/10/2014 4:29 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Grant Ridder wrote:
For those interested, this is the Xen bug they were fixing with the reboots
http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-108.html
Ouch. Good thing Bashpocalypse is still capturing everyone's attenti
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Grant Ridder wrote:
> For those interested, this is the Xen bug they were fixing with the reboots
> http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-108.html
Ouch. Good thing Bashpocalypse is still capturing everyone's attention...
Interestingly, Amazon *didn't* disc
For those interested, this is the Xen bug they were fixing with the reboots
http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-108.html
-Grant
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Reed Loden wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:39:39 -0400
> Peter Beckman wrote:
>
> > Likely some sort of potentially serious bug or fl
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700, Dave Crocker said:
> In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as
> attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack.
Which is a good reason to encrypt all network traffic by default, even if
it's just videos of kittens.
I am on DSLreports quite often and do not believe their database is
updated much anymore. Was great
back in the DSL days though.
Although this one forum might be ok for asking:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/isp2isp
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:07:12 +
Brian Free wrote:
Brent,
It's been awhil
> for the purpose of a specialty domain registry where registrants (such as
> hosting companies) would be contractually required to guarantee privacy to
> their end customers.
Hmmm...
Until privacy is a feature across many/most hosting services, anyone
specializing it is, in effect, identifyi
Brent,
It's been awhile since I used it seriously, but dslreports.com comes to mind.
Cheers,
Brian
-Original Message-
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:42:53 +
From: "Meshier, Brent"
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: MetroE Providers
Message-ID:
<68c2cbc977f3e04799df9c76e938e7090859f..
I am not opposed to the proposed use but that doesn't seem to be a great
fit for what I believe a practice for a ccTLD should be.
mehmet
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Here's an interesting, and fairly thoughtful and well written, piece about
> talks going on in Norway to
The actiontec I have from them, for years now, supports IPv6, they
just don't support it at the ONT or further upstream; no idea where
the limitation is. I don't use their router though, just get ethernet
from the ONT. We have Fios in a few remote offices; hitting them up
from the business side d
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Anthony Junk wrote:
I already have IPv6 on my router at home. They rolled out an update a few
months back that added the capability for the latest 802.1N model. I'm not
at home to look at it but I'll update with the model this evening.
Like many others, I would be intereste
Here's an interesting, and fairly thoughtful and well written, piece about
talks going on in Norway to utilize two ccTLDs which are assigned to the
country for outlying territories for the purpose of a specialty domain registry
where registrants (such as hosting companies) would be contractually
I already have IPv6 on my router at home. They rolled out an update a few
months back that added the capability for the latest 802.1N model. I'm not
at home to look at it but I'll update with the model this evening.
Sincerely,
Anthony R Junk
Network and Security Engineer
(410) 929-1838
anthonyrj.
16 matches
Mail list logo
